If you’re buying biomass add something along these lines to your purchase agreement: Biomass must have a COA for potency, heavy metals, microbial, and pesticide testing. A second randomized sample will be performed by the buyer, and at the buyers expense. Should the results not pass testing and conflict with the initial COA, the purchase is void and the seller incurs the cost of testing. The seller is then offered the opportunity to resubmit randomized samples at their own cost if they believe there was an error. If the results are satisfactory, the buyer incurs the testing fee’s as a quality control cost.
Edit: If the purchase can be done through Escrow, even better.
In theory, you could have an actual SOP for purchasing and sales that your purchasing department uses. Although we tend to think of SOPs in terms of manufacturing.
Subject line changed to try and make the answer more generally available…
Imo acquisition should also be accompanied by a test extraction that is sent out for pesticide testing, unless you’ve got a working relationship with a lab who will look harder on biomass destined for extraction.
We use the farmer’s COA as a reference but we ALWAYS collect our own samples and then use a 3rd party lab to have testing done before buying any biomass.
We use a seed sampler rod. We put the sample probe into the super sack and collect about 3 different areas. We then take all the samples from that super sack and grind it up and send it in for testing.
Its similar to this, the three opening can be closed by turning the handle. So you close the openings put the probe in the biomass turn the handle to open the slots and shake a little. close the handle again and remove, then dump samples into a bag. Repeat this until you feel you have sampled enough areas to get a good representative sample.
I recently lost a sale because of this too. Distro SOP stated that the only person allowed to give out COA was the attorney and that it would ONLY be given directly to the buyer. Really bummed me out. I was about to be able to finish buying my property in Guatemala! Oh well…
Edit: Ease of sale is incredibly important, but I also would say that trading license info for COA is totally in bounds
So many fakes and posers out there. If they don’t readily provide a COA and lic # they’re fake. Move on. Product details aren’t classified information, they’re requisite to a transaction. If you get pushback on a COA its a red flag you should not ignore.