I find the recovery rate is highly variable depending on the liquid levels and vapor pressures in the collection/solvent tanks, the heat on the collection pot and the amount of cooling in the post pump heat exchanger.
I don’t really think about recovery rate as the defining factor to a system like a lot of people do. I look at material throughput and ease of use/simplicity.
I would take a slower peak recovery rate to have a higher total material throughput and/or a simpler system any day of the week.
For example, right now I really like keeping the recovery/feed tank in my system at around 80psi during operation. This allows for a good flow rate when flooding columns and enough pressure to push through CRC.
I can maintain this pressure easily with an active pure propane system. This is in part because of the heat of compression from recovery pump and in part because of the higher volatility of propane over butane.
Propane will have 80 psi vapor pressure at a temp of about 50F or 10C. This isn’t too crazy of a temperature to keep your solvent tank at while operating and is very easy to achieve by throttling the post-pump heat exchanger and letting the heat of compression naturally raise the temp/pressure in the tank. Also, given a starting temp of 50F, it’s still very easy to cool the liquid down to the -30 to -40C range using a coil in dry ice slurry on the injection side.
Butane on the other hand would need to keep the solvent tank at about 118F or 48C in order to maintain 80psi. This presents some issues and would be much more difficult to work with and maintain.
Running this way pretty much makes a passive recovery setup impossible because by definition you are keeping a higher pressure in the recovery tank than in the collection pot to facilitate injection. This means you will need the compressor in order to work against the pressure gradient on the recovery side.
Also, given the low vapor temperatures coming off a typical collection pot due to subzero extraction temps, the heat of compression afforded by the recovery pump is actually an advantage in gaining back valuable head pressure on the solvent tank to keep the process moving and to avoid having to use nitrogen and its associated headaches and additional steps to deal with.
I have worked out a nice system where I know how to throttle my post-pump heat exchanger by adding different scoop sizes of dry ice at different times so that I have 80-100psi in the solvent tank when I need to inject and about 40-80 psi or slightly lower while I’m just straight recovering and going for fastest recovery rate.
Do you see how operating this way might not give the absolute best peak recovery rate because not long after I want peak recovery rate I want high solvent tank pressure?
That’s why I strike a balance and leave some pressure in the tank even when I’m in “peak recovery mode” instead of just loading my heat exchanger with dry ice and dropping the pressure close to zero.
Do you also see how operating this way along with using pure propane vapor to clear the columns allows me to just focus on racking up column after column?
There’s no nitrogen. There’s no venting. All that’s really needed is to monitor the heat exchangers and pressures and rack up column after column.
But beyond that another big advantage to an active system is there is no need to keep the entire mass of solvent in the solvent tank at or close to zero like in a passive system.
Keeping all the solvent chilled becomes exponentially more difficult and expensive as you step up system size and is much more difficult with propane over butane. Granted, large compressors aren’t cheap but I think they’re generally cheaper and lower maintenance/higher reliability than a large capacity chiller system like what you would need to run a large passive propane system.