It's Willbillytek. Duh

Bringing it to the masses!!!

1 Like

vetivazulene and guaiazulene?

Like I said in that post, this isnā€™t the type of thing you post on a public forum. Iā€™m seeing way too many people pop up every day on this forum with zero attention to safety trying to figure out the next get rich quick chemical conversion. We all know people would immediately just go and order some synthetic technical grade version of it from a chem supply outlet and dump it in everything they can. I donā€™t want to feed into this one. I only posted to say that this ā€œimpurityā€ is hardly considerable as an impurity and if it really is coming from cannabis like the producer says then itā€™s highly unlikely to be toxic at all. Not my place to breach on someone elseā€™s tech, just weighing in on concerns over the safety of the color compound(s).

12 Likes

I think what people do with the information is on them. I am just a curious person trying to learn more about what is going on.

The most attractive thing about working in this space is how open people are about discussing things. It makes it fun to learn when compared with other chemistry spaces where everyone is tight lipped and canā€™t share anything.

I donā€™t know what the impurity is, but if its not THCA then it is an impurity in your THCA. That isnā€™t controversial and you donā€™t need to put quotes around it. If you donā€™t want to share what it is that is totally understandable from a commercial standpoint.

Blue crystals do look really cool.

1 Like

And as such must be declared.

3 Likes

Itā€™s cannabis derived :joy::rofl::joy: meaning I donā€™t need to disclose anything (which is funny coming from the one trying to sell a shitty TLC plate for 6 figures without any real information) so your full of shit and Now I have to question your intelligence because how many SOPs actually offer 100% breakdownā€¦because most bho concentrate have over 20% unknowns distillate generally has 5-10% unknowns and just pure diamonds can have up to 3% unknown :expressionless:

11 Likes

Not trying to hate on your product, I literally canā€™t because I donā€™t know whatā€™s in it.

However, plant derived =/= safe to consume.

4 Likes

Sound like hate to me but :man_shrugging:

I guess People should probably stop smoking all of your plant derived extracts too

3 Likes

which part of cannabis isnt safe to consume? this is a whole new tangentā€¦

but the disty blunt is just calling my nameā€¦think the disty is making me a schizophrenic ā€¦ im talking to my disty blunt like she loves meā€¦ :joy: :rofl: :joy:

6 Likes

Sorry it sounds that way, I know it can be contrived to sound that way with just words and no tone or inflection.

If you donā€™t want to answer this, I understand, canā€™t hurt to ask though. Are you altering any of the constituents in your cannabis solution?

For example, D8 is basically ā€œsafeā€ but the unknowns produced as an aside have absolutely zero research done with them, and therefore people can be healthily skeptical of their safety profile. Do the specific molecule(s) responsible for the blue color have any research that concludes they are (relatively) ā€œsafe?ā€

I only ask because, even cannabis terpenes are being found to be slightly different than many of their (from other plants) botanically derived counterparts.

10 Likes

Iā€™d like to quote one of the greats in this instance. Itā€™s about how it is consumed.

6 Likes

is there any data to back this up?? someone that only smoked cannabis and no other substances? seems like we will see data like this 100 years in the future but dont seem like we have much todayā€¦

i would love some clinical studies on thisā€¦ maybe im asking for too much this is the cannabis industryā€¦ i just stumbled opon the thcp threadā€¦ LOL im done here for a while. ill see everyones work soon enough.

1 Like

That smoking stuff is bad for you? Absolutely.

Edit: Marijuana and Lung Health | American Lung Association

6 Likes

killa asks for dataā€¦ gets absolutely! i mean smoking ciggerettes has data on how many years it takes off your life and various things like thatā€¦

i see that American lung assoiciation saying its badā€¦ but it has no statistical data behind it.

I would imagine being around burning wood in your house to be bad tooā€¦ but what isnt bad for you.

Sugar?? trans fats? the sun??

3 Likes

Yes, life kills you, and smoking cannabis, especially in heavy amounts, can be bad for you.

The poison is in the doseā€¦ the saying as old as the day is long.

They write those articles to summarize statistical data, if you want data just use Google Scholar and do a search bud.

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C23&q=effects+of+smoking+cannabis&oq=effects+

4 Likes

nothing ive read ever suggests that cannabis smoke is the cause of some deadly reaction or disease in anyone. I dont think anything is good for ya. but im just trying to find out what in cannabis is not safe to consume??

you made the inference that willybilly ā€œcannabis derivedā€ ingredient might not equal safe to consume in minuscule amounts like he stated .03 so im trying to learn what part of cannabis in minuscule amounts is not safe to consume?

just asking because my feeble mind doesnt know much about this obviously

1 Like

ā€œHowever, there are numerous case reports of bullous emphysema among cannabis smokers. These findings have not been confirmed in systematic analytical studies and probably represent uncommon adverse effects in very heavy cannabis smokers.ā€

I spent 10 seconds finding that.

1 Like

i guess the word what? means nothingā€¦ its all good bro! we are talking cannabis dervied in minisule amounts. im trying to see the connection.

:love_you_gesture: :100: thank you

Iā€™m gonna bet itā€™s the hydrocarbon solvents. (terpenes)

2 Likes