Dude, aren’t you aware that
Just joking @Mresearch…reading definitely helps though.
2 Likes
and this wasn’t remediated at all?
how would I distill THCa? You mean decarb it and distill the THC?
2 Likes
Cant get any purer then 1000mg/g and mine was colored so what you’re saying isnt true.
This isnt true either lol been there done that its yellow unless color remediated
Here want another one?
This one is 999mg/g as tested by kca yet still has color. Color has nothing to do with purity im really surprised you dont know how oxidation effects color
It shouldnt matter that the test above has other cannabinoids when you said
You dont need to distill it just decarb it under vacuum and youll see its yellow
that’s kinda my point. he said to “distill the THCa”
1 Like
“Gets me too high”
It surely quiets the room down for about twenty minutes.
Nebulize it as alcohol and physiological saline…mixtures…
Sets them straight…lol.
Something to be said for the “pale yellow paste”. PYP.
Seriously, can you melt a “diamond” in the microwave by 50% power and 30 seconds at a time on a precycled weighing paper.
Two or three blasts will do the trick…can you weigh before and after. 5% loss in weight is monohydate…can you check this out. I don’t have what “you call diamonds”.
this needs to be checked out one way or another.
I.e. 18/376 or so ? But don’t decarb at all.keep it cool.
1 Like
It seems like we are both on the same page about how oxidation effects color. You can make a product thats water clear and it not be pure and on the opposite you can make a pure product that’s got color
This tested at like 99.5% TAC which is less then the 2nd distillate test i posted yet it has no color
1 Like
yeah, we’re on the same page. I’m just wondering how it would remain that clear with zero remediation throughout the whole process…
like you said, there’s oxidation before the plant is even extracted. to produce colorless distilled D9 THC without any remediation would mean the plant/extract was virtually never exposed to oxygen. ever. I don’t think I’ve ever seen that done before.
and yes you’re right, the absence of color doesn’t necessarily mean it’s in its “purest form”
1 Like
You trying to use a test that has room for error to prove cannabinoids arent clear at their purest form is kinda comical. I bet Raphael Mechoulam is rolling in his grave. Remember how willbilly tested his blue diamond’s and they came back at 99%+ that blue was clearly an impurity and it didnt take much.
The syringe i posted was of thca isolate decarbed then distilled.
My preferred method for decarbing thca is in a reactor under vacuum. I personally dont like decarbing with terps present.
I will load reactor with thca, pull vacuum. Once maximum vac depth has been reached i will then apply heat i aim for 130c jacket temp. I will let let it go as long as it takes for the vacuum level to reach its deepest depth again. I will then cool down to 70-80c and back fill with nitrogen or argon and dump it out.
Also why does it matter if something has been “remediated” if its in its isolate form? Thats what making isolate is some type of remediation.
3 Likes
The fact you dont understand oxidation is comical to me and the fact you want to claim error on an MS test when your brain doesnt even realize how much more sensitive MS testing is compared to hplc. Hplc is ppm and ms is ppb.
Mechoulam is right that d9 is clear in its purest form when UNOXIDIZED. Youre scientific knowledge is lacking right now pretty badly. Explain to me how the above d8 I posted then is clear at 99.5%? Ill wait make sure to explain or youre admitting im right
Ive literally proved you wrong with test results and you claim error lol that syringe you posted isnt even cannabinoids i bet its vacuum oil isnt 
Lets see some test results or do you not have any?
Because remediation doesnt remove the oxidation thats been happening since the plant first started growing the cannabinoids as cbg. I’ve decarbed many diamonds in a vacuum oven (which seals better then any reactor will) and UNLESS COLOR REMEDIATED they melt to the same color they crystallized as
Dam im dissapointed in you you literally have no idea what youre talking about when it comes to oxidation and you sit here and spread misinformation.
1 Like
are you not using analytics to justify your similar claims? 
when you said “in its purest form” my mind went to “unadulterated” but you’re right. remediation doesn’t matter in terms of purity.
But you can make D9 that’s just as pure and it not be water clear. that’s the point. THC isn’t always water clear “in its purest form”.
And I guess if analytics don’t mean shit, like you said, the world will never know who’s got the most pure product.
1 Like
There is plenty of literature that clearly states its clear.
@kcalabs since you seem to be the most respected analytical company in the industry. Will you weigh in on if cannabinoids are clear at their purest forms
I believe the oxidized compounds are no longer d9thc in this example. I believe the oxidization is making a new compund. Please prove how oxidized prodcut is still a cannabinoid
2 Likes
And literature is never wrong right? Things are never corrected when new testing and literature comes along?
Already showed you this… reading is hard i know
You ever seen cbd that turns purple when run through magsil?
Thats cbd quinone which is hu 331 on that chart
How are you going to fight the farher of cannabinoids?
Heres something for you to wrap your little brain around
How is cbd quinone purple even in its purest form? Its not due to impurities its due to how the molecules refracts light
O so in other words no longer cbd and a different compound due to oxidization
2 Likes
Lol because his research is old and he isnt God and knows everything. If youre refute has gotten to this point youre admitting defeat
