If you call Phoscheck and ask about there fire retardants theyll tell you that they’re all phosphates
It’s the ingredients they dont list that cause d10
Sulphates are no longer apart of fire retardants here in CA anymore
If you call Phoscheck and ask about there fire retardants theyll tell you that they’re all phosphates
It’s the ingredients they dont list that cause d10
Sulphates are no longer apart of fire retardants here in CA anymore
I’m sorry for my laziness, but I’d like to request a spoon please:
What did you find out about sulfur and isomerization? I’m drowning in a metric ton of sulfur treated THC biomass…
all i have to give is a plastic disposable spoon, but a spoon none the less
here is a thread with some discussion of sulfur and isomerization
a lot or a little? hot an fast or low an slow in your opinion?
Too slow and you risk degradation, too fast and you risk purity. It takes practice to develop the skill to know what works best for your system and the product your running.
yes im am realizing that, I appreciate the response
You can run fast and hot you just need to make sure youre stripping the heads really good
Running too slow can cause co distillation as once all the cannabinoids are gone the tails will distill
If they are adding ome minerals, or salts, or oxides… something that is not smorphous, it should be indentifiable with powder XRD. Even it is less than 1%.
Raman spectroscopy may help as well.
I messed up my Distillate to D-10 by not knowing my filter paper with magnesol had a hole and some of it ended up in the boiling flask and I ran it just like norm and had a HUGE D-10 spike on my chromatogram. Live and ya learn I suppose…lol
You sure its d10?
Show us the chromatograp I doubt it s D10 but none the less very interested to see the spike
@Kingofthekush420
@AlexSiegel
You guy s are the pro s on D10
What you think ?
I don t think it s D10 looking at the graph but I am no pro😉
Unless I am misunderstanding your argument, you are incorrect.
Not letting me post an image so here is the citation:
Ummi Kalthum Ibrahim, Ida Idayu Muhammad and Ruzitah Mohd Salleh, 2011. The Effect of pH on Color Behavior of Brassica oleracea Anthocyanin. Journal of Applied Sciences, 11: 2406-2410.
So you are saying that anthocyanins change color because of “pH” and there is no chemical change? Minus the hydration and proton transfer reactions these are all just isomers giving the different colors. Just because something is reversible with pH doesn’t mean it isn’t reacting. I am assuming you don’t consider the isomerization of cbd, d8, d9, d10, etc. to be a reaction???
hes not a chemist… youre wasting your words unfortunately
I disagree
signing up to state “nah, I don’t think so…and here’s why” is a very good use of ones words imo.
thank you @bigbone
There are even far more complicated color/pH diagrams for anthocyanins. This is where ion chromatography really comes in. I’m headed for the maximum number of fractions.
yeah, I was just digging out the figure I assumed @bigbone wanted to post. dropped the link to make it easier to access the source.
In my whirled Anthocyanins were “just a marker”. by which I mean, an incredibly useful genetic tool . amazing genetics experiments have been performed in maize & petunia using the various genes in the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway. including exploration of epigenetics.
pretty (spotted/sectored/striped) purple transposon traps is really all I see…
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046/j.1365-313X.1998.00005.x