My manufacturer actually has experience dehydrogenating with these!
Can you attest to anything other then the fact uour manufacturers palladium membranes?
No?
So my manufacturers experience makes them superior?
Yes!
See how easy that is?
Just because they’ve never used them for cannabinoids doesn’t mean they can’t. Cannabinoid dehydrogenation is much simpler then methane dehydrogenation but you’d know this if you even looked at any papers ever published on the subject
Basically you have no idea what you’re talking about and I actually do because I’ve talked with the chemist who help set the project up
It’s funny how I mention something and you flock to it and talk about it with NO experience
I’ve been using palladium for dehydrogenations successfully unlike some here who want to talk about a technology they’ve never heard of till I mentioned it here
If you can’t attest to the company’s actual performance then it’s safe to say you don’t know what you’re talking about and out of your league here once again
Because A company actually has experience using them for dehydrogenation which you can’t attest to with your company B
that certainly demonstrates your in-depth knowledge of the subject.
And in such a professional manner too.
I don’t have a horse in this race. I have had zero input into @MagisterChemist’s skid.
I asked what evidence do you have that one membrane is superior to another.
Your response is that you’ve talked to ONE of the manufactures. That may be enough for you, but I highly doubt it does much to convince anyone else reading along here
“It works with methane, costs about $10k, I haven’t tried it”…
I don’t have to know anything about the subject at hand to assert that your “evidence” of superiority is lacking…because you have offered ZERO evidence beyond “I said so!”