Do you have any d8 for sale? Can we get a COA and your SOP for the conversion? Your starting material also? I’d ike to cook some in my kitchen.
2 Likes
I have one, leaves you with 50% in unknowns, it’s all good tho. No ones trippin.
1 Like
I do sell D8 but I don’t sell anything on here because I’m not a verified slanger. I’ve tried conducting business through this forum in the past and have had mixed results. Nowadays I prefer to just add commentary to the community and look for equipment to purchase.
My stuff is 99% total THC 90% D8 9% D9 and started from 99% CBD Isolate.
If you’d like COA’s you’ll have to DM me as I don’t want to try and “slang” anything.
We’re currently working on getting it compliant, but we’re also working on getting a THC license out here in Colorado so we will see which one happens first lol. Although, speaking with my lawyer on the phone this morning it seems like “hot” D8 can be treated similarly to “Hot” crude/full spectrum distillate.
If you want to talk SOP’s I can get you our SOP, in conjunction with a signed NDA/NC.
I have nothing to hide, and I would be happy to share it with a potential customer, provided that customer agrees they won’t be ripping me off after I share with them how the product was produced.
I would NOT recommend trying to make this product the way I do in a kitchen, easy to hurt yourself for sure.
5 Likes
my head hurts
But I see d8 thrown around like a hot topic. What’s good. 50-100L week needed.
1 Like
I was joking on the kitchen. It sounds like that might be a nice mix as is in carts for the legal d9 states.
1 Like
What would your lvl4 hemp slanger requirements be? Feel free to correct.
Starting Material COA
Extraction Type
Extract(crude) COA
Conversion Type
Oil COA
Any additive COA
Container Type
<2% questionable unknowns found in the final product
What else concerns people? I am all for raising the bar.
5 Likes
At level 4 I would say…
-Any converted material needs to be 98%+
-Start material COA/Ending material COA
-Data included (chromatogram at the Minimum)
-I would argue extraction type shouldn’t matter
-Residual solvents/solvents+reagents used in process
Keep in mind I don’t find issue with unknowns in material that has not been converted… it’s when people start playing around with synthetic chemistry that we need to hold higher standards.
7 Likes
If there is unknowns and they couldn’t name them, dare I make a Synthetic Chemistry section and put it there? The topic has come up many times.
2 Likes
but… i WOULD like to see viagra offers all day
1 Like
I love Viagra I like to pop a handful of Xanax 30 minutes before I pop Viagra that way I can’t remember why my dick is so hard
12 Likes
Careful what you wish for
1 Like
niiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiice , sounds like a fun evening
Yeah i got pretty grilled. I just left it becuase i thought it was better for everyone to see my point of view and to have a clear understanding of any risks that others had voiced. For me personally I have never been a fan of seperating the negative comments because its has a more real touch to it. None of us here are perfect. Thats been said to each there own if @Mosaic_Co-Labs felt it was best for his thread to split it then i support his decision.
5 Likes
Im all about this. Lets set the requirements high for those who wish to meet them. I came here with products and I got pretty grilled. I amswered all questions honestly and then the next time around i came back with 89% along with the chromatograph. I have no problem stepping it up it thats what is required amd i think a lot of others would say the same.
5 Likes
I have to disagree with you that @Mosaic_Co-Laba should have his thread split on his request.
All he is trying to do is remove the warnings to potential buyers about how dangerous his product could be.
If he doesn’t want to get flamed for his product he should sell a better product.
4 Likes
Do you know about wikijane.com ?
Feel free to create a page under draft:wip [WikiJane.com] and when you are finished we can move it up to the complete section. Instead of a 55 post conversation we can work to summarize the issue and a single link can be posted as a warning. And still curious what you think about a Synthetic Chemistry section and moving posts like that to it.
2 Likes
Add it to the header links imo and create a post about it with a small how to. I’ve tried to get others involved, but this project deserves more direct attention. In my opinion.
breakfast of champions
1 Like
Either keep the discussion entirely focused on science and delete everything else, or stop moderation altogether. Otherwise you will always appear bias to somebody, somewhere, for something
2 Likes
Been mulling on this all day. Maybe a category where there are higher standards. “Hash and Stuff” itself is a little haphazard.
I am open to a new parent section with higher posting standards and letting the rest of the sections go unmoderated or self moderated. This is todays thoughts. I agree with you @RedundantAlexithymia
6 Likes