on what metric?
Size? Cost vs. Performance? Reliability? What Metrics are of greatest interest?
His system is setup to cool a reactor with pumped dynalene vs. pass through chilling. Our entry level model (2.5 ton) could be configured to do something similar when ordered in the pumped dynalene configuration. The 2.5 ton model is rated for -48 Deg at full load, but can reach -60 Deg C under no load. (see quotes below)
However finding a way to use the R-507 directly is more efficient due to pumping and total temp losses from dynalene going through multiple heat exchanges on the chiller and reactor itself.
I.e.
Chiller w/ R507 (@-48 C) > Heat EX > Dynalene (@-43 C)> Heat Ex (Or jacketed vessel) >> Process Solvent (-38 C)
(Assumes 5 Deg heat ex approach, this could be smaller with a more massive and expensive $$$ heat Ex)
vs.
Chiller w/ R507 > R507 Line > R507 ASME Flooded Heat Ex(Or ASME jacketed vessel) >> Process Solvent
If R507 is used is this manner the process solvent could theoretically reach very close to -48 Deg C under full load, and will trend towards -60 Deg C under no load condition in the process solvent.
The downsides would be more engineering and systems integration risk when directly circulating refrigerant from the chiller into the extraction room.
I just updated my quotes with some charts and cost projections, and added a quote for the 15 Ton (Piston) model, a 15 Ton Screw drive model is also available but much more expensive:
Long story short the 15 ton (Piston) drive provides the best value for money, a huge amount of capacity and saves you money via a waste heat recovery loop. The 15 Ton (Screw) model is ~2.5 times more expensive, goes to -60 Deg C and has the super cool screw compressors.
https://www.greenprocess.solutions/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/15_Ton_R507_2Stage_Piston_System.pdf
https://www.greenprocess.solutions/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/2-5_4_Ton_R507_2Stage_Piston_System.pdf
https://www.greenprocess.solutions/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/40_Ton_R507_2Stage_Piston_System.pdf