Whats the accurate real world statistics on Illumintated Extractors

No one cares what the outer jacket temperature is able to achieve. What matters is what is the injection temperature of your solvent, and can you maintain those temperatures while cycling. If the Behemoth or manticore can achieve that, neat…but can the smaller systems with the smaller paired ancillaries hit it? We didn’t see it. Yeah we got some halfway decent product out at times, It was a constant struggle to get the system to perform, to wait for things to rechill, etc…Hell I spent months running it with dry-ice coiled buckets to make up for the issues we were having.

We wanted so badly for this thing to work and spent months and months really trying, really fucking trying to get this thing to work. For a long time we were convinced that we were the issue, that all we needed was more training and it would finally click and start working. Hell even when Mo came out on the third visit the goal was to figure out if it was a skill issue or a system issue and an hour into running the system he’s on the phone w/ JD saying yeah mate this thing is not performing correctly. All we wanted from day 1 was a working system. We spent so much money with you guys and got left out to dry.

You’re still on about the chiller lines being backwards but again…they weren’t. Why is that something that was only brought up on the FOURTH visit out? Wasn’t noticed during commissioning as we fought the chilling issues. Wasn’t noticed when you came out and we were still fighting chilliing issues. Or when Mo came out and we were still fighting chilling issues. On the last one, it’s something Jacob mentioned but then dropped as a cause after they again verified the lines were run correctly, then spent the last day messing with the MTA thinking it wasn’t hitting temp.
You posted pics of a temp gun reads like it’s some kind of smoking gun, but dude, those were temp reads from an IR thermometer of reflective tape over the top of insulation…how accurate of a read was that? Jacobs last visit wasn’t an honest attempt to fix the system, it was an attempt to try to CYA over the issues that were not being fixed.
We ran the lines to verify (by run the lines I mean physically getting hands on the line and following it from start to finish), re-ran the lines to verify again MULTIPLE TIMES we verified orientation, even had the goddamn plumbers come out and certify that they were hooked up correctly. When we ripped that piece of shit apart, guess what connection port I used to drain out the loop? Hint: It wasn’t the fucking top one. closed the return valves and pumped it out from the drain valves we put in at the bottom of the loop. Man if the only thing causing the issues is what you claim, that we hooked it up backwards (ie supply into the top, return on the bottom) then swapping it would have been the first thing to do before we ripped that shit apart and rebuilt it as an actual functional machine. You even said "It did appear in one of your videos that you had it connected correctly at one point." Mate…at no point from the week before we commissioned the system to the day we ripped this thing apart did we change the orientation, hookup, or setup on those lines. If they were correctly connected at one point they were correctly connected at all points. What would be the reason for us to have them correctly hooked up…and then go flip them? When it already was having issues, why would changing it to hooked up backwards help?Why would we do that? We wanted the thing working, we did not want to spend another 150k changing it to make it work. But that was the only option left to us.

For the personal stuff you’re getting bogged down on man it seems like it’s hitting a nerve since it’s coming from multiple people but you need to take that as a wakeup call. I know this is the cannabis industry but you’re selling industrial equipment to a maturing industry, and this stuff matters. It matters because it’s who you are and how you represent yourself. Getting drunk and high on the job is not a good look and I am kicking myself for even allowing you into the facility in the first place. I caved on safety and compliance out of a desire to actually figure out how to run the damn thing and figured it would be ok but that was compromising my safety procedures in a way I shouldn’t have. Do you think it’s safe for you to consume alcohol and do dabs before/during an install and training? Is that how an actual professional conducts themself?
I should have sent you back home and taken it up with JD then and there back in December.

This is a huge blackeye for you and your company publicly because people are calling you out for the claims you make and they way you conduct yourself. You can flood the zone all you want but the truth is hard to fight.

I see a lot of folks coming on here and sharing their frustrations, but haven’t heard shit from the happy customers yet. Let’s see it folks! Anyone seeing great results on stock systems? Anyone seeing lower than -5c Injection temps (or anyone actually modify the system to see injection temps)? Anyone seeing amazing customer service or training from someone that isn’t doing dabs in the car before coming in for the job or pounding doubles during lunch break?

Zack, I said it before, but I do really hope you get your head on straight and get the help you clearly need. Alcoholism is a hell of a way to go. You have some innovative ideas and though they’re poorly executed and bogged down by shit build quality, the potential for what this system could and should have been is something that I’m still deeply disappointed in.
Instead of owning it and making things right you point fingers left and right and insist it’s not your fault it’s the customers who what…spent all that money and then don’t want it to work? I know you mention the ‘relationship getting untenable’ but you don’t stop and ask yourself why it got to that point? man we spent MONTHS trying to get things fixed.

What a reputable company that stands behind their products would have done is get their engineering team on a plane and out at the job site to overhaul the damn thing and not leave until it’s working. It’s what I asked for, multiple times, and was told repeatedly that you didn’t have the bandwidth because yall had these installs and commissions for bigger clients on bigger systems, that unit down in Florida. And yeah I get it, 1mm is > 400k. But that doesn’t make the 400k guy feel like a valued customer. If someone has a major failure in your new system from day 1 you’d think that would be top priority, new orders be damned, you need to get the old ones working. Instead it was this dragged out slapdash process of video calls with jeff, US rebuilding the corkens and swapping out part after part trying to make it work. And yeah it got hostile towards the end, but we tried so hard to be patient to be understanding to be cool with you through the process and we got hosed anyway. Lessons were learned.

We lost clients, market share, and money. Illuminated caused deep financial damage to a small company, and it cost us dearly. It was a shitshow of a process from day 1 and while I know you don’t want to hear it, the truth hurts. Buying an Illuminated system was the single largest professional mistake I’ve made in my 16 years in the industry.

:clinking_beer_mugs:

7 Likes

If it wasn’t backwards then PLEASE EXPLAIN THIS… ???

How did it exit at the top colder than it came in at the bottom??

It absorbed heat and got colder?

24C is 75F / room temp, -2.5c is 27.5F, and -5.1c is 22.82F.

IF it came in at the bottom like you keep saying, how is THIS physically possible???

Note the rotating waterfall.. that doesn’t exist when it is connected correct. It rotates because our baffles were rotated 90 deg at each point * 5 baffles… it was a waterfall because the glycol was FALLING…

worth adding, this should be shown on one of the smaller units. Showing a picture of cold columns on a behemoth and saying “look it works” is like showing the towing capacity of an F350 and saying ‘see these guys that have had issues with their ranger are full of shit’

Also, hook up the thermocouples throughout. Show the actual INJECTION temperature. I know there’s a delta but how much? How does it drop during operation/cycling? a cold jacket is wonderful but how much good does that do you if you’re injecting 5c butane over your frozen material? Remember, this system doesn’t generally operate with soaks, it’s a constant recycling of solvent, so if you’re not cold you’re pulling color bodies and waxes. I still don’t know if the issues we had were a fundamental flaw in design, ancilliary issues, or build quality issues, could be any or all of those things, but the weld blowouts we saw were pretty damning and indicative of the overall quality of the system.

3 Likes

That looks like bad temp gun placement

1 Like

word for word addressed above my man.

"If it wasn’t backwards then PLEASE EXPLAIN THIS… ???

How did it exit at the top colder than it came in at the bottom??"

it didn’t. Jacob, the putz that he is was trying to get accurate reads on shiny tape over insulation.

I posted pictures of those exchangers from the backside and they’re not forming that pattern. You can see where warm vapor lines are touching them, that’s not waterfalling that’s a line conducting heat onto it.

Why didn’t you notice it when you were out? Are you saying we were having all those issues and decided to purposefully swap it around? Why would we do that?

Or maybe the internal construction on those things had some issues? Sure had 'em on the Process and utility subcoolers.

We verified the chiller line flow direction so many times…even had a 3rd party come out and certify it was run and hooked up to manufacturer specifications (posted above).
The theory y’all threw out about it being hooked up backwards was something he latched onto like what, the first day into the last visit? We verified again that the lines are run correctly, and then he dropped it as an issue. If that was it, and he was there to try, last ditch effort to fix this, why didn’t he swap 'em? We very much wouldn’t have said no. It got dropped and he moved on. It was the first and only time it had been brought up until we sent you a demand letter.

yeah. But that doesn’t fit the narrative does it?

from that last visit:

I agree that unedited run videos, live pressure/temp readings, injection temperature, and clear ancillary hookup are all useful evidence. We can and should document that better.

But that does not answer the specific question I asked.

Their claimed flow path was that the MTA/glycol entered the bottom of the condenser at -2.5°C, absorbed heat from the process side, and exited the top at -5.1°C and was visually proven with the WATERFALL effect seen in the picture that when correctly connected DOES NOT HAPPEN.

That is the problem here.

If the fluid absorbed heat, the outlet should be warmer than the inlet, not colder. If the top was colder than the bottom, then either the flow path was not what they claimed, the lines were reversed, the fluid was not flowing through the condenser correctly.

So before we move on to injection-temp debates or full-system proof videos, can someone explain how a heat-transfer fluid enters a condenser at -2.5°C, absorbs heat, and leaves at -5.1°C?

Because that is the specific evidence being ignored.

Also, if “ancillary issues” are now being accepted as a possible explanation, then that is exactly why the MTA/condenser hookup and flow path mattered from the start. They insisted it had to be the machine, while refusing/blocking the diagnostic path we were trying to verify.

That is what is confusing here. It seems to both be impossible that the ancillary hookup was the issue, and also now possible that ancillary issues were involved. :person_shrugging: :person_facepalming: :rofl:

As far as the tape/IR gun issue: the tape was used because shiny stainless gives unreliable IR readings due to emissivity/reflection. That is exactly why people put tape on shiny metal before temp-gunning it. Calling it “bad temp gun placement” still does not explain why the claimed heat-absorbing outlet was colder than the inlet and the clear and obvious WATERFALL effect in the condenser.

And yes, I understand I can run the system without the MTA. That does not mean every operator can do that. If the machine worked while I was there, made product, held temperature, and then stopped behaving the same way after I left, operator error is absolutely a valid possibility that needed to be investigated before blaming the core machine.

Operator error is not an insult. It is a real diagnostic category. Wrong valve position, wrong hookup, wrong flow path, wrong sequence, wrong interpretation of gauges/temps, or refusing to verify the suspected problem can all create issues that look like equipment failure when they are not. :victory_hand:

condenser blowby?

That was the MTA fluid temp though… not the solvent temp.

The MTA glycol entered the TOP at -5.1c and EXITED the BOTTOM at -2.5c AFTER absorbing heat and FALLING down the baffle path forming a WATERFALL.

This is exactly the confusion I am talking about. I was not asking about solvent blowby. I was asking about the MTA/glycol side of the condenser. If the glycol enters cold at the top and leaves warmer at the bottom, the waterfall pattern makes sense.

If someone claims it entered the bottom and left colder at the top after absorbing heat, that does not make heat-transfer sense.

THAT IS THE ENTIRE PROBLEM HERE… IT was 100% hooked up BACKWARDS and the waterfall picture + temp gun readings PROVE it.

whats the delta P across the condenser? is it possible it’s condensing and re-evaporating and causing some weird reading through the joule-thompson effect?

warmer liquid flowing down from the cold inlet to the warmer outlet could cause liquid propane to flash off?

How? the IR readings are on the MTA fluid, NOT the extraction solvent…

The PROBLEM was the MTA lines were BACKWARDS and we were NOT allowed to correct or even check how it was connected… we were NOT allowed to disconnect the MTA lines EVER.

Instead they INSISTED it HAD to be something OTHER than the MTA lines and still hold to that to this day while all of a sudden allowing ‘ancillary equipment’ as a now possible scapegoat. :person_facepalming: :rofl: :victory_hand:

This is really SIMPLE… (Literally kindergarten level physics…)

It is absolutely NOT POSSIBLE to get the WATERFALL effect they had on the condenser when it is connected correctly… :person_shrugging: :person_facepalming:

The problem is that they keep dodging a basic physical contradiction while throwing personal attacks and side theories at it. :person_shrugging: :rofl: :rofl: :victory_hand:

Side theories…ok mate.

Because he wasn’t measuring the thermofluid temperature. He was getting a (poor) reading on the surface temperature of the tape OVER the insulated wraps.
Have you considered that those reads might not be super accurate? We had a probe for that temp gun, its in the case he took it out of, he could have plugged it in and taken a read from under the wraps but he didn’t. Or maybe he did at some point and it didn’t support your case. That would be fairly definitive.

Let’s try this. Airflow in a C1D1 room is across the floor. The lower fittings are…near the floor. If the guy is taking surface measurements of tape over the insulation the delta you’re seeing doesn’t prove anything about the actual temperature of the termofluid, but it does say that (potentially, assuming he got an accurate read trying to IR gun UV reflective tape like a scrub) the surface of that wrap is a little warmer (probably from steady warmer airflow across it, and my man I’m happy to dig up the smoke test videos from when we installed that room to show EXACTLY the flow rates we get and how fast it flows at floor vs chest heights on regular and purge mode operations). We’re talking a few C delta, and I think that’s a pretty reasonable root cause.

they weren’t

Blatantly false. All we wanted was this thing working. If y’all had said we needed to paint it blue I would have gotten my ass over to home depot for some paint. Jacob came up with that theory on the 1st day of his last visit out, dropped mentioning it and moved onto MTA issues as the next likely cause. It only got brought up again once we sent the demand letter and now as you’re scrambling trying to discredit our posted experiences. If he wanted (or had asked to) swap fittings around I would handed him the box of pex crimps and wished him the best of luck.

Ok, so here’s a shot of the condenser 34 minutes into my long form video on running the system.

where’s the waterfall zack? You see that frost pattern a bit on the other side (and I would have focused on it if that had been brought up at that point as a possible issue). Maybe the warm lines touching that specific part of the condenser are thawing the frost a bit? There’s no lines on the back and you don’t see a pattern.


condenser 30 minutes of running after that previous shot from a different video. Where’s the waterfall pattern? I don’t see it.

another view from the side (utility adn process subcooler)


No pattern.

Yet another view showing more towards the front:

Ooooh…maybe I swapped 'em to make the video! THen swapped 'em back for…some stupid reason.
It would be working good in the video yeah?

Right? RIGHT?

You keep saying that like caps lock makes it true.

which was how it was hooked up from beginning to end. Why on earth would I flip it around and change it being backwards?
Why didn’t YOU, the system designer, the Lord High Wook himself, Zack Lantz, not notice if it was hooked up backwards during the what? 5 days you were on-site? Were you a little too baked to notice?

If it was hooked up backwards then, why would we have decided to purposely hook it up backwards, what purpose would that have served? Making it work even worse than it already had been?

Anything else?

Mate I can do this all day.

Measurement or not it was hooked up backwards and was obvious under load.

Showing pictures not under load doesn’t prove anything.

You can reframe this 1000 different ways, but I am going to keep coming back to the same point:

The MTA lines were backwards.

The waterfall pattern and the temperature readings match wrong-direction flow through the condenser, not the claimed flow path.

There is no getting around that.

I will post an image tomorrow of what the condenser is supposed to look like when it is connected correctly.

So far you are just trying to bury the actual issue under a pile of “maybe” explanations.

Like this?

Lol you’re a crackup. ‘ok well regardless of the fact that the measurements were bullshit we’re definitely right’
If it was obvious why didn’t you catch it when you were on site? You’re the guy, the fuckin MAN right? You would have surely noticed, right?

what about…pictures under load?

Because when I run the system I dont actually NEED the MTA to make it work… Kinda the tradeoff of being the inventor of the tech is I can run it perfectly without user errors, but will still see an ELEVATED condenser temp with it off. THAT doesn’t magically go away. :person_shrugging: :person_facepalming:

IF you run it PERFECT you can jump into each phase perfectly is a bit different operation vs a new user that has been on the system only a couple weeks to a month or so and keeps making user errors will obviously not run it perfectly and will need the MTA. THAT is the whole point of having it is so when you need it you have it.

Jackets hit temp. That is what we show in EVERY demo… NEVER once have I said it injects at the same temp the jackets get too. That is like hooking a -70c dry ice coil up to your system but still only injecting at -10c while the temp the coil is in is at -70c but because its not injecting at -70c then the dry ice is obviously a lie and you should demand it doesn’t work.

Can clearly see the SS hoses had no frost on them from your dry ice coils even. What a waste.

Is what it is.

We will be riding at -40c to -50c tomorrow on our jackets, will update with pics then.

Showing a condenser cold before meaningful vapor load is not the same as showing it under the load condition that produced the waterfall pattern.

A cold condenser is not automatically an under-load condenser. The relevant load is the heat being transferred into the exchanger, driven by vapor mass flow, vapor density, enthalpy, and the operating phase of the system.

Showing the condenser cold during a different operating condition does not explain the waterfall pattern that appeared under actual load.

So the question remains the same:

When the MTA condenser is connected correctly and carrying the actual heat load, how does it produce a falling/waterfall frost pattern through the baffled path?

My position is simple: it does not.

That pattern matches wrong-direction MTA/glycol flow. :victory_hand:

Occam’s razor… :person_facepalming::saluting_face::wink:

Did you just dox someone?

I wouldn’t be surprised if you show up at MJ Bizon next year and somebody printed out 30 or 40,000 leaflets and put them all over the facility and hired people to hand them out at the entrance lines to let people know this is how you do business

1 Like

Quite the backread, I’m pretty invested now.

Glad I’m not in the market for a new skid, tbqf.

I do wonder why a few degrees C and a baby chiller working or not working makes the difference between running like a top fuel dragster and a shitbox boned out corrola. It shouldn’t. If the inventor can make it run without it, why can’t anyone else? That’s problematic, obviously there’s a knowledge/training gap that needs to be closed either through operator training or automated control.

8 Likes