Just a brief look at the test and that 22% cbc pops out. . It’s It’s issue I’ve been fighting on A recent batch…any reason to believe the start biomass may co tain sulfur resudues?
2 Likes
Doh!!
Yeah, absolutely NOT CBC!!
Can’t believe we STILL have labs getting that wrong!!
@Canna_bis503 : THC Imposters (Isomers)
And go smack the lab director up side the fucking head, they’re an idiot!
If they LOOK at the data they’ll find the absorption spectra is wrong for CBC
Edit: and please out said fool here. So others can avoid them. Or educate them…
7 Likes
Short path CO2 crude is like SPD on Very Hard mode, lol.
Surprisingly common how often it turns out “CBC” on lab results when not processed correctly.
2 Likes
wait … what are you trying to say?
I don’t think it contains sulfur residues - In Oregon we had bad fires last year, and I know that some of the flower we extracted into other material (terp sugar) had a bad bad taste to it… But when you rosin press it, it doesn’t taste bad.
Follow the links!!
It’s not CBC. You wrecked it. And the lab you’re using is three years behind on the science
4 Likes
I’m just gonna quote the wizard…
1 Like
Worse part is - this is happened with everything that has been ran. They have taken a 70% THC, ran it through the short path, and got 55-80%
1 Like
Do some reading (note the 25 threads linked to “thc imposters”). Inform your crew. Go have stern words with the lab director for misreporting CBC.
Ask that biochemist of yours where they imagined the CBC not present in the crude was coming from all this time?!?
3 Likes
8 Likes
Doest thou grok mass balance yet?
Ask your biochemist to run you through it using the CBC & THC numbers on your last batch of crude & distillate.
They should feel pretty dumb when they’re done…
2 Likes
He is currently reading through the “THC Imposters” thread now.
1 Like
Please tell us which lab this was.
2 Likes
You in Oregon?
Yes. You’ve got a lab in OR who hasn’t gotten this straight yet? Please share…
Labs in OK might have an excuse…
Who would you recommend ? - I don’t like name dropping. But there is a few.
^^^ that material was Critical Kush, and tested at 71%
No seriously:
You are paying these people to get this right. If you don’t inform others who is getting it wrong, we all suffer.
The community has set you on the right path.
Give back.
Name names.
of which?