We have never asked for those, and he is a new hire who we just brought in.
1 Like
I’d recommend sending the sample you sent to lightscale to several labs. Any that call CBC should be scratched from the list.
Then explore the chromatograms with the lab director. ask them why they didn’t mention the big peak they didn’t quantify.
Go with the lab that gets it right.
Either telling you what it is, because they actually HAVE the standard, or at least raises their hand and states there’s something weird with your sample…
Repeat till you find one. Report back so others may benefit.
Which is the point of this joint
One more time, because it’s important
That only gets them so much slack 
1 Like
haha - honestly. Well, he did rather lose some sleep last night over these results. But really, I am still trying to gather what our process is wrong? Decarb? or… what?
1 Like
1 Like
I personally do not … But again, I am getting low THC % from other material than C02
Links to how…
Out of free spoons.
In OR and can be paid to continue…
4 Likes
It likely is not just one thing. At a quick glance, you have the possibility of low pH in your crude, definitely overcooking in the decarb phase, and could have a myriad of problems with your actual distillation SOP.
It’s likely either time to buy a clue (hire @cyclopath or any number of us in Oregon) or get to reading, reading, reading, and more reading. Also way past time to invest in in-house analytics. No reason (or excuses) at this point in the game to not have them.
2 Likes
You need to remove your heads (stuff that will distill at a lower temperature than your cannabinoids) or your temps are too high and you are also distilling your tails (stuff that will distill at a higher temperature than your cannabinoids). If you like to distill at like 150 and you still have terps, residuals, and other stuff in there you need to remove them, so you would run it at a lower temperature that doesnt distill over the cannabinoids and remove them, then raise the temperature to 150 and then make your distilled cannabinoids. If you need to dial in your temps and are distilling to hot, like 180 in my example, you could be distilling over other things besides the cannabinoids (and also any of those lower volitiles if you aren’t removing your heads).
2 Likes
Catalyzation due to retards?! I’m sorry I mean retardents…
2 Likes
Are these head temp referance? In flask? Outside flask?
This may be a stupid question but aside from all of the other mystery possibilities could you explain how they currently ramp temperatures on the short path or what type of control is operating the show so to speak… I have recently started monitoring external boiling flask temperatures as a way to troubleshoot a top jacket on a mantle that is not performing correctly, And in doing so I was finding that the outside of the flask is receiving wild temperature swings, even on the smallest of pv/sv differences…say bumping up 10*c…would inconsistent energization of flask ever spike enough energy in flask for isomerization given long enough dwelling times?
In flask
1 Like
Ok cool that was my guess…just wanted to double check …regulated with probe in flask? Or outside?
Probe is in flask.
1 Like
Thanks for clarification…sorry to everyone else for sidetracking:confounded:
1 Like
Where do you sourse your biomass for making crude? Is there a chance it got hit by the fires last season. We were speculating a few years ago that fire retardant dropped from the sky could cause some isomerization. I also thought I read it used a metal catalyst to make d10 @Kingofthekush420 might be able to help figure out what’s going on
2 Likes
Glass is a lousy thermal conductor. I suspect those spikes you’re seeing on the outside of the flask are pretty much par for the course when controlling based on temp of fluid in the flask (which doesn’t seem to be the incorrect place to measure).
1 Like