ermā¦azulene?
Blue magoo?
Blue Clifford (the big blue stones) duh
5 Likes
We send rockets to space that come back down and landā¦ sure someone could figure out how to make our pot diamonds blue and not be toxic.
6 Likes
I did 
13 Likes
I expect better from someone with your intelligence 
11 Likes
Youāre MVP
2 Likes
Bringing it to the masses!!!
1 Like
vetivazulene and guaiazulene?
Like I said in that post, this isnāt the type of thing you post on a public forum. Iām seeing way too many people pop up every day on this forum with zero attention to safety trying to figure out the next get rich quick chemical conversion. We all know people would immediately just go and order some synthetic technical grade version of it from a chem supply outlet and dump it in everything they can. I donāt want to feed into this one. I only posted to say that this āimpurityā is hardly considerable as an impurity and if it really is coming from cannabis like the producer says then itās highly unlikely to be toxic at all. Not my place to breach on someone elseās tech, just weighing in on concerns over the safety of the color compound(s).
12 Likes
I think what people do with the information is on them. I am just a curious person trying to learn more about what is going on.
The most attractive thing about working in this space is how open people are about discussing things. It makes it fun to learn when compared with other chemistry spaces where everyone is tight lipped and canāt share anything.
I donāt know what the impurity is, but if its not THCA then it is an impurity in your THCA. That isnāt controversial and you donāt need to put quotes around it. If you donāt want to share what it is that is totally understandable from a commercial standpoint.
Blue crystals do look really cool.
1 Like
And as such must be declared.
3 Likes
Itās cannabis derived 
meaning I donāt need to disclose anything (which is funny coming from the one trying to sell a shitty TLC plate for 6 figures without any real information) so your full of shit and Now I have to question your intelligence because how many SOPs actually offer 100% breakdownā¦because most bho concentrate have over 20% unknowns distillate generally has 5-10% unknowns and just pure diamonds can have up to 3% unknown 
11 Likes
Not trying to hate on your product, I literally canāt because I donāt know whatās in it.
However, plant derived =/= safe to consume.
4 Likes
Sound like hate to me but 
I guess People should probably stop smoking all of your plant derived extracts too
3 Likes
which part of cannabis isnt safe to consume? this is a whole new tangentā¦
but the disty blunt is just calling my nameā¦think the disty is making me a schizophrenic ā¦ im talking to my disty blunt like she loves meā¦
6 Likes
Sorry it sounds that way, I know it can be contrived to sound that way with just words and no tone or inflection.
If you donāt want to answer this, I understand, canāt hurt to ask though. Are you altering any of the constituents in your cannabis solution?
For example, D8 is basically āsafeā but the unknowns produced as an aside have absolutely zero research done with them, and therefore people can be healthily skeptical of their safety profile. Do the specific molecule(s) responsible for the blue color have any research that concludes they are (relatively) āsafe?ā
I only ask because, even cannabis terpenes are being found to be slightly different than many of their (from other plants) botanically derived counterparts.
10 Likes
Iād like to quote one of the greats in this instance. Itās about how it is consumed.
6 Likes
is there any data to back this up?? someone that only smoked cannabis and no other substances? seems like we will see data like this 100 years in the future but dont seem like we have much todayā¦
i would love some clinical studies on thisā¦ maybe im asking for too much this is the cannabis industryā¦ i just stumbled opon the thcp threadā¦ LOL im done here for a while. ill see everyones work soon enough.
1 Like
That smoking stuff is bad for you? Absolutely.
6 Likes