My point is that is a separate and irrelevant point. We are arguing over terminology from a taxonomical system based on geographic origin and using that to presume that they produce completely different effects simply because they were related to those landraces.
In reality I’d expect a wide variety of entourage profiles in either that overlap in effect, just like we see with human DNA between the sociological construct of “races”. There is a considerable range of variation within whatever class you want that probably dwarfs that between c. indica and c. sativa.