Illuminated Extractors x ChemTek Workshop FEB 26-27

[Tech1145]

@Zack_illuminated

It is alive and well - a standard part of our operating procedure and will always be a part of our procedure. HPHE™ helps to defeat solvent channeling by forcing solvent into all reaches of the column. Due to HPHE™ we increase the solubility of terpenes and other volatile molecules. With HPHE™ we have zero need for atomization devices as our solvent is self-atomized to the fullest extent. Thanks to HPHE™, we have reduced the amount of consumables needed to run our system; no wasteful nitrogen has ever been purchased by any of our clients ever. Our HPHE™ pending patent tech also solves many other problems experienced in the industry, including MAQ limits.

Haha, at first I thought you were making a little joke with all the little TM symbols, but then I remembered who I was talking to and I know you are dead serious.

Is HPHE what you call your patent on hot looping?

Any data to support the bit about “Due to HPHE we increase the solubility of terpenes and other volatile molecules.”?

It all sounds fancy and great but where is the proof that things actually happen the way you say they do?

You can’t just pop up and say these things out of nowhere. Is there a side-by-side experiment showing a “regular” extractor leaving things behind and your machine picking them up with your fancy atomized solvent?

Here are some of your past quotes regarding HPHE:

@Zack_illuminated

We have completely removed the need for a ratio style of extraction. We use a phase transient solvent state to which takes on its own unique properties not seen with a pure liquid solvent. We invented a new technology to get away from the old regurgitated techniques.

@Zack_illuminated

We utilize the solvent in way never before thought of in ways which increase the standard efficiency ten fold. We literally got rid of the ratio style of extraction and use a 1:1 bio to solvent. No more the old coffee maker style extraction but instead the more complicated espresso!

@Zack_illuminated

It is likely the most difficult way to operate and extract in the world, but if understood, is roughly 50 to 200 times (or more depending on your ratio) more efficient than the traditional technique. We have a deep understanding of the actual physics behind it’s operation and have utilized this as much as possible within our design!

@Zack_illuminated

We use a Phase Transient solvent that is not a solid liquid nor gas nor supercritical, but rather a mixture of vapor and liquid, also known as a saturated vapor.

Care to explain what you actually mean by phase transient? (you better start trademarking that one or I’m stealing it.)

Any proof or data to substantiate your claims about “increase standard efficiency ten fold” or “50 to 200 times more efficient then the traditional technique”?

The last quote of yours is another little marketing BS gem. Please tell me more about the new state of matter you have discovered.

Haha, “not solid liquid nor gas nor supercritical”.

Is it a plasma? Bose-Einstein condensate?

You really love telling other people you’ve invented things, don’t you. Regardless of whether or not you actually have invented anything, the fact that you love saying it so much just makes me think about that South Park episode even more.

@Zack_illuminated

These childish games are getting old.

Right back at ya my man.

Put up or shut up.

You are the one making claims. The burden of proof is on you.

You can’t just come on here and make threads titled “Most advanced extraction system on the market” and repeatedly tote yourself as some type of genius inventor guy then not show up with some serious proof.