I’m not asking for a spoon lol. wtf are you talking about? this benefits me in no way, I was just inquiring about what he was on here bragging about.
I asked the dude a simple ass question (that doesn’t pertain to you in any way, fwiw) and he gave runaround, NDA-type answers. which is fine. his prerogative.
I’m sure he appreciates your heroic efforts though 
Seems like You want to start drama and have nothing important to add 
move on or get back on topic 
I thought ethanol extraction was also patented?
I found a nice article talking about this case.
Doing a brief google search, I found several patents claiming the same solvent based cannabis extraction, and I’m pretty sure same extraction methods have been patented in the previous century in addition to every variation imaginable.
That article makes it read like: Come federal legalization they’re about to be fucked, but due to the neat fact it’s illegal: they can get away with breaking the law and patent law. Insert Judge:
The Honorable John W. Holcomb denied the motion to dismiss for illegality without writing an opinion, only stating that the denial was “for the reasons stated on the record.”
Haha
A trial to determine patent infringement is now set to begin on October 23, 2023.
Now to dig for that update…
I posted the final judgement from the uspto above already
Man that’s annoying. I don’t try to miss your goodies either. Thanks.
I’m not entirely sure what you are trying to say?
Do you mean states in the USA? Or are you talking about international? If you want to post snippets then do it from the domestic patent where it holds it’s weight because otherwise you posted complete garbo in support to any point you tried to make.
Only a United States citizen or corporation (still requires a usa citizen as principles) can own and enforce patents in the USA. A USA citizen who isn’t a citizen of a foreign state and without direct ownership of a patent on said foreign state cannot enforce a patent. Ergo you must have a registered patent and be a citizen of said foreign or domestic state ashore.
So you can’t be a United States citizen and buy patent cert of a questionable nature and use them for contracts or enforcement in the USA or in any foreign state.
Don’t you know this.?
This is why United States citizens cannot sue anyone in any other country over a patent infringement. You sue the people importing or reselling or making money in the United States. A United States citizen is required to sell the ownership of a patent to a citizen in a country there internationally to enforce it(themselves). That person needs to make a hefty to majority of the fractional profits because in their country they are legally responsible and liable for any lawsuits brought against the product or the principles of that country. The ip owner cannot be held liable since not a citizen. So you’d basically have to give up ownership of a patent in that country under contract, that you are entitled to royalties and involved financially in litigation. But if you want to sue it’s a whole other ballgame.
oh yes. Only things from USA hold WEIGHT to you. Allow me to retort in kind XD
C’mon Google masterspdking
Don’t mind anyone who isn’t willing to put their money where their mouth is. Some people pack a punch with their statements. Some don’t.
This is the topic. You are part of the topic. He is right though.
If you have ndas you aren’t even supposed to mention them. You let your licensing department handle that.
If you don’t Wana share that’s one thing, but you aren’t involved in any ndas that have restrictive non published patent content. There is only one set of patents and non published patents that have ever existed and always has been related to nuclear materials manufacturing and handling trade secrets.
Even the government tried to patent a UFO technology and that’s public. You neither work on nuclear materials or ufo technology. So you are circle jerking your answers when you use the letters NDA.
International application and patent certificates often always say things like us application. It isn’t a valuable thing to add in your discussion sake. The only thing that matters is a registration with the uspto which comes with a utility patent registration. no foreign filling agency that gives out certificates is valid or enforceable in the USA.
Lmao, you can always reverse find the images of text and find it right away if you’re good enough. You said it yourself. It’s on Google.
I’m just agreeing 
while setting you on a hunt. A wild goose chase you may feel, but the reward is in the reading. Here.
You show me your patents 
first Connor
I think this case was about patents wasn’t it?
For staying on topic 
How did this end up? Who paid.
What are the value of patents in the science of cannabis and who do I know with a portfolio hmmm
Are you talking about a sniper from this patent?
With the section cut out. Or were you referring to a worldwide application that was filed. I’m not exact sure.
this has the photo from above
Is this another related reference.
You guys are actually talking like you’re all palls and on the same page in the industry, when if these are legitimate will billy patents (if) then it’s the same exact thing and attempts from larger corporate patent shark organizations you are all shit talking on.
Reading these with questionable legitimacy of it’s protections for will billy and or enforcement is questionable and vague at best
Will billy bravo if you babe fools paying you for this shit. Bravo.
Dang will billy trying to claim evaporative crystallization in pentane.
Guess its no longer first to do and actually first to patent.
thanks Obama
Its just crazy that multiple people were doing it openly before he even filled, but ue will get the benefit as h3 filled first.
I am only aware about what I can read on Google relating to patents and patent law. But it seems that these stolen/re-propagated/semi plagarized/rewritten plagaristic patent content can’t be enforced by these guys. Will billy apparently copy and pasted into patent applications; if it was granted - the methods and processes of public record through Instagram and social media content would discredit it’s value as prior art or novel utility. Meaning watching what people were already doing, and it was publicized and then taking that data and re writing into into a patent makes it entirely unenforceable and illegal to license such a claim. If people who are paying for such a license find this out they can sue him for some hardcore liabilities and damages for having to be engaged in such a “non disclosure” patent 'license" to opperate scheme.
My two cents.
