ROFL ⌠Way to take that sentence completely out of context to better suit your erroneous arguement. Iâll let the extra chromosome slide this time, but it clearly states âwhether growing or notâ ⌠it doesnât say ⌠âwhether growing or synthesizedâ. Need more proof of what that statement means? Look up Section 297B of the Farm Bill under State and Tribal Plans, where it says ⌠âa procedure for the effective disposal of plants, whether growing or notâ ⌠it literally means whether itâs growing or dried plant material. They were not referring to synthesized CB1 receptor agonists lol. That would be in direct opposition to multiple federal statutes (i.e. the Psychotropic Substances Act/Convention on Psychotropic Substances/Controlled Substances Act). And speaking of âdodgingâ ⌠the entire reason that the 0.3% threshold was established was due to the fact that it does not conflict with the CSA or any of the other aforementioned federal statutes because itâs non-psychotropic.
No matter which way you try spinning it, or how many times you pointlessly keep referring to synthesizing or decarbing (non-psychoactive) cannabinoids, like CBD ⌠Delta-8 is a synthetic THC because it is formed âby a process that chemically changes a substance extracted from a naturally occurring plantâ, thus making it illegal as âall synthetically derived tetrahydrocannabinols remain schedule I controlled substances.â
Let me know when youâve removed your head from your asshole.
You just quoted an FAD excerpt, which was in reference to dietary supplements. I merely used that as an example of how federal agencies view synthetics in general - hence the keyword âakinâ.
No. It actually says ⌠âshall not apply to substances created by naturally occurring (((biological processes)))â.
And no, Delta-8 is absolutely not biosynthesized by either hemp or marijuana. Itâs actually a degradation artifact âformed under the influence of heat and light during processing and storage of the plant sample.â (ElSohly, Wang, Avulaet al 2018. Quantitative Determination of Î9-THC, CBG, CBD, Their Acid Precursors and Five Other Neutral Cannabinoids by UHPLC-UV-MS).
Let me know if you need more citations proving that Delta-8 is not biosynthesized by hemp or marijuana.
Bro before I posted that you didnât even know the definition of hemp, I guess ALL DERIVATIVES doesnât really mean ALL DERIVATIVES does it? (Atleast in your version of English)
D8 from hemp isnât scheduled stupid d9 is, if d8 was scheduled then the DEA could do something about it
Lmao by your definition decarbing is synthetic then as it changes the substance extracted from the normal plant
By your definition of synthetic it has to have never came from a plant and cbd did so
Have you ever thought about this?
Why are states banning d8 explicitly if itâs already illegal?
Because itâs not when it falls under the definition of hemp
lol ⌠Yeah it is true lol. Iâve got plenty of literature proving that D8 is absolutely not biosynthesized. I just quoted one from ElSohly himself. I usually post on Instagram, but maybe Iâll make a thread here, just to show you what a fool you are.
I take this as a compliment (I know it wasnât targeted at me) and admittedly canât comprehend but am trying to stay capable and able to understand on a business standpoint. I want to learn so bad but understand my strengths.
Holy shit do you even open your eyes while reading herp derp? Nowhere in that garbage you posted does it imply that Delta-8 is ((biosynthesized)). Itâs merely referring to quantification and Iâve already demonstrated that Delta-8 is âformed under the influence of heat and light during processing and storage of the plant sample.â ⌠NEWSFLASH; THATâS NOT A âbiological processâ. Thatâs an artifact of post-harvest degradation you fool.
Both hemp and cannabis synthesize delta 8 and delta 9
(You said they donât, you also posted a definition of a synthetic that says it canât have ever came from a plant and d8 that falls under the definition of hemp doesnât meet that criteria)
XD wait we still talking d8? Lmao on the brisk of the hhc launches. God I wish I had it in me to still argue, itâd be hard not to when you been so deep in making the products. So I feel that.