HHC Patent Co Chromatography

isomerism comes in a million shapes, forms and flavours

6 Likes

XD got shwifty

last i checked you needed a cock for that, so…

5 Likes

does this mean there’s only 2?

Kinda like d10 and 6a10a and all them?

you wanna get taught sum stereochemistry, huh? :spoon:

4 Likes

Anyone boof hhc?

6 Likes

Playing legal hopscotch

1 Like

it’s ok if you think so, but that stuff gonna make me the Warren Booffett of novel cannabinoids

1 Like

Well I’m still not seeing anything about where you mentioned undetermined stereochemistry. You know well enough that, in chemistry, words matter. You seemed to imply that the “wiggly” line had some if any indication of what their starting material was. I know you know that you could just as easily use a terpenoid moiety coupling to end up with a racemic mixture.

1 Like

If I call myself Warren Booffett and make a youtube channel of me boofing random drugs will this forum donate the drugs? Lets start with HHC.

15 Likes

They claim this is compliant though so it must be hemp derived. The route @roiplek mentioned seems to be the most likely method they used. Or is there someone on the market making THC from olivetol?

2 Likes

Olivetol is one of those things that immediately put you on a watch list with the DEA if you try to buy it. So I don’t think anyone is using it outside of research and if they are they won’t be for long.

A lab capable of producing hex would probably have the means to do CBD>D9 with little or no D8. Which is also something people shouldn’t aspire to be doing.

4 Likes

Fixed that, in italics now so it’s more obvious that was a rhetorical question :sweat_smile:

I suppose there is some debate about what “synthetic” really means. Is it a nature identical? Or is it a spice cannabinoid? I suppose it’s your interpretation that’s dictates your willingness to embrace all the tools in the box.

People are doing it all day everyday. OR just buy the methyl ester of olivetol. Then, you’d get less abnormal THC.

I’m definitely not wrong about it putting you on a watch list:

Whether or not you guys want to go and do it anyway is your own decision. Just helping them build a case.

3 Likes

It’s comical though you actually post a reference that even mentions it’s an unreliable source. :joy: Do you realize it’s in the same category as class 2 solvents like toluene? Don’t get caught in an echo chamber. Try to really understand the claims you make without taking everything you read in a google search, Wikipedia or not, as fact.

It says unreliable source because it’s a link to erowids.

The link to erowids brings you to a controlled list from the Sigma catalog. So yes I know your highschool teacher says not to use Wikipedia but the sources check out. I posted a screenshot because it’s a lot easier than posting a list of several columns of chemicals in a list. I would think this was common knowledge around here and a source wouldn’t even be needed but apparently not.

Aluminum foil is also on the list. So it should go without saying that not all things on these lists are scrutinized to the same degree. If you want to think a literal precursor to D9 is going to go unnoticed then you have fun with that.

4 Likes

I think you’re blowing the severity of sourcing olivetol out of proportion. Do you think the DEA has a huge bone to pick with what is likely a small-to-hardly-existent population of people buying olivetol for synthesizing delta 9? Whatever that population is, it pales in comparison to pretty much anything else on the DEAs radar. Not to mention, there’s a number of states where its not illegal to possess THC. Precursors to amphetamines and synthetic opioids, psychedelic’s and designer drugs are more their speed, wouldn’t you reckon?

Again, the whole “olivetol is a watched chemical” thing is from a bygone era where someone thought tons of people would be making THC synthetically instead of growing it…which we now know is not the case.

3 Likes

Wikipedia didn’t exist when I was in high school and maybe not even when I was in college. :man_shrugging:t3: So, your backhanded comment is as flaccid as your attempt to make Olivetol more suspect than CBD as a precursor to D9. Just stop dude.

A sigma catalogue from 1992, long before CBD was operating in its current legal status.

2 Likes