That’s a damn good yield of ~62 g/sf, assuming one light per 16 sq ft. I use 60-70 g/sf as the basis for most financial estimates.
Regularly exceeding 80 or even 100 g/sft (roughly 2.82 lb/light or 3.5 lb/light assuming 16sf) can be done when growing large yielding cultivars using high planting density, excellent canopy management, high PPFD, and optimizing environment, fertigation, and biostimulation.
Those are two different metrics. I apologize if my post implied otherwise.
In my mind, g/sf is a biomass yield metric, g/sf/kWh is a cutilvation efficacy metric, and the cost to produce each gram ($/g, or $/lb) is a profitability metric.
Not trolling… well I kinda am trolling but I’m not lying about the grams per watt. If you can think for yourself it’s easy to figure the ONLY way this is possible. That’s the only hint i can give with out giving it away… but I’d bet there’s alot of people here already doing it .
they said you killed my mom thread with some anti usa crap. Dont complain about vets or usa. complain about joe biden and the people who voted for him. The bipartisan system is dumb as shit.
fuck you too for the backhanded compliment= i just came from poker and lost which is rare so my mind is on point. I wanna still be there making money. i did all this gardening and cleaning and then went and lost/// waaaa Now its back to the trim bid and slave labor.
Wasn’t really starting the thread to convince anyone. Was just trying to gauge how many people are already using this technique. Guessing nit as much as u thought would but I’m pretty sure I’ve already seen a thread here somewhat describing how it’s done
I use 60-70 g/sf as the basis for most financial estimates.