You stated Delta 8 and Delta 10 were “grey area” and that it was not scheduled, I replied to your comment not his.
ttps://www.who.int/medicines/access/controlled-substances/IsomersTHC.pdf
"These constitutional isomers of delta-9-THC were never subject to a critical review and are still in schedule I of the 1971 Convention. "
Also " (±)-Δ10-THC is in Schedule I of the 1971 Convention. "
Regarding his post while i do agree the text in that bill is completely in favor of what he says at the end of the day D8 and D10 are schedule 1; CBD is not. There is no precedent set for someone getting caught with CBD isomerized to D8 so for an attorney to give the green light is wrong to me. I think the possibility that you could be the precedent and it could NOT go favorably needs to be acknowledged by your legal reference.