So…does anyone label their material socks for tracking purposes?
Ive seen folks permanently number their CUP-30 bags (cloth tags, sewn to the bags) when prepacking dozens of bags and storing them in the freezer. Seems like it might be worth implementing the same trick with my material socks.
associating a permanently attached sock number to a Metrc tag (that can’t be dropped into solvent) helps solve the “what’s in the tube?” problem. It could also be used to track “what WAS in the bag?” or “which socks are hot?” in the case of pesticide contamination.
…AND it would make it easier for me to document where the hash we get from WASHING the socks actually came from.
hmmm, you’re washing bags 100 through 145?
We can tell METRC which packages that 300g of hash came from, and it can now go to distillate in a compliant manner.
If @Beaker was still with us, I’d have him try and embroider barcodes. As he’s not, I’m not quite sure where to start.
I see where your going, and I like it. I dont have a solution other then the stainless dog tags mentioned above or on airplanes and race cars we install these stainless wires and tags that wrap around bolts to show they haven’t been fucked with
Interesting, maybe use a tag sorta like luggage in an airport, write UID
DATE.farm.strain.run#.product output.
We just started using big material socks and use a label on one of the handles with UID, we just wrap around handle and fold/stick to its self, works great. Extractors simply translate that info to their run log and rip off label after extraction is complete.
He’s trying to track the actual socks not so much the content in them. Issue is if you had a run with bad material, how do you later go back and isolate that contaminated sock. Unless you have a numbered system for your socks or a tag system its impossible.
Have you tried putting socks in the material column and doing a dry run to rinse off any residuals on em? We do that when we “top off” and wash all material socks like that.