Ok? So just because someones words hurt your feelings, you feel it’s ok to change the title (on a thread they started)?
You being in your feelings should have been the end of it…go take a bath and cry about it.
Lol
6 Likes
I have no idea what the first title of this thread was. And you’re right it’s not a first amendment per se but I would say it’s a decency and equal application kind of thing and who are you… Who is any one of us to be the arbiter of what is?
The original poster I’m assuming had a purpose in naming the thread what it was and you changing it has changed what point they were trying to convey. I get what you saying about it maybe not being cool thing to do but if we’re going to go down that road why don’t you change this-
I mean please think about the point I’m trying to make before you answer.
It didn’t hurt my feelings 
And yes, I did.
Only if you join me, lover 
I will for a tuggy…
1 Like
Thanks, that makes sense.
So I understand; we can adjust threads outside of EC as long we don’t change their intent/nature, like a helpful title janitor? (Not to disparage janitors, but only so I understand the rules.)
1 Like
@Pupparoo eats his farm raised meats and sun’s his balls, he doesn’t care for your feelings
8 Likes
Or, apparently, grammar. 
Proper grammar is not that impressive on an internet forum lolz
And neither are feelings, according to @pupparoo, yet you felt the need to post about them. 
I didn’t know that you’re a young brunette female android!
2 Likes
decomission Ralf
2 Likes
LOL. Do you like Star Trek? I used to love Star Trek TNG.
“Why didn’t they call it planet trek?” 
Geordi be like 
1 Like
So is
A)rosin chemically extracted or
B)people are just making guesses that sound good while wearing a lab coat 
2 Likes
I’m gonna say both. Water is certainly classified as a chemical.
And while they aren’t making guesses, lab costs make cannabis pseudo chemists feel warm and fuzzy.
I’d love to see everyone’s college degrees and work history in chemistry……
I’ve have met a few real chemists on this forum so this isn’t for everyone but I’m thinking the % of real chemists on this forum is under 5-10%??
9 Likes
So, if rosin isn’t “solventless” as a finished product, flower wouldn’t be either, since the same substance(s) that would be the solvent in the rosin process are present in the flower.
This is an interesting conversation, but I’m not sure I really want to see this Pandora’s box opened by olcc and the like🤔
7 Likes
fixed that for you…
3 Likes
I didn’t wanna insult some of the people that went to school for chemistry but just never worked in the field for years.
But I think it’s higher than 1%. Maybe I’m being an optimist.
The whole argument over “solventless” is fueled by chemophobia.
The only solvents that matter are residuals, and if you’re doing your job correctly there is very little of any of those remaining.
I wonder what the butane composition of a whopper is? You likely get more hydrocarbons inhaled filling your gas tank than from properly made concentrates.
15 Likes
…those motherfuckers be putting butane in our guzzoline too
4 Likes
I don’t know about you guys but I personally dump whatever solvent I can find in my rosin because I love you all so much and don’t want to feel left out
15 Likes