As the industry continues to evolve, I’m interested in hearing perspectives on which companies deliver the most effective turnkey closed-loop systems. Specifically, I’m curious about comparisons in terms of throughput, cost efficiency, operational performance, and overall product quality. Thermal management—such as the role of chillers and heaters—is also an important factor, but my primary goal is to gather informed opinions and experiences across these parameters. I also understand that most of us modify our equipment to better fit our processing needs, but overall just curious to hear everyone’s opinions. Would you buy one or build one ?
3 Likes
From our perspective at Illuminated Extractors, our focus is on minimal power consumption with maximum cooling and heating available on demand. Our systems operate with effectively unlimited solvent during extraction, using the system itself to run the system. In short, we use the system’s own thermodynamic behavior to both heat and cool itself, then leverage that cooled state to drive further cooling.
No water heaters are required — this is covered by a U.S. and Canadian utility patent.
We’ve evolved our original single-compressor architecture into a dual-compressor methodology with fully isolated utility and process loops. This separation allows the system to be actively cooled even when extraction is not occurring, which is one of the few operational states where heat is generated but not immediately consumed by the process itself.
Our systems can operate without the MTA, though it exists to compensate for operator error and improve robustness. During one of my recent installations and trainings, I fully charged both sides of the system and performed multiple dry runs without the MTA at all while waiting on an electrician to resolve a power issue.
While I hope some of our users chime in here, most of our clients are not active on Future4200.
We use our patented compressor-exhaust methodology to run the system. There is more than enough heat available from superheated vapor to drive boiling, while that same boiling process is sufficient to drive condensation of the pressurized superheated gas in the system. This heat-and-refrigeration architecture is itself protected by a utility patent.
In addition, we employ our patented sub-cooler architecture. This includes a process sub-cooler that chills extraction solvent prior to use, as well as a utility sub-cooler that supplies cold solvent to other components requiring cooling.
Our extraction loop is also patented and covered by two independent utility patents — one for the method and one for the device. This architecture enables effectively unlimited solvent during extraction, eliminates the need for nitrogen for both operation and CRC, and allows the process side to be used as a refrigeration input when desired.
Building systems independently carries real risk given the current patent landscape — not just ours, but others as well. There are multiple active patent families that can easily impact passive or improvised system designs.
We can run bio lbs/hr: 12.5, 25, 50, 100, 300 as standard units we currently sell.
+50c to -50c on demand heating and cooling on all systems.
For long-term viability, it’s generally safer to buy from a true innovator with established patent protection than to retrofit or build around constraints after the fact. 
Edit: We have also our recently filed pending terpene isolation tech and a continuation in part to our heating and refrigeration patent pending as well.
2 Likes
I have 2 Luna IOs, and they are great.
BUT if I were just starting a new lab, I would definitely look very hard at Illuminated.
3 Likes