Vaping CBD is cool, prove me wro... oh

Kinda weird they used MCT oil as the oil base, but whatever.

TL;DR: Vaping CBD is worse for you than nicotine apparently.

very weird… who vapes MCT?

1 Like

People that buy gas station CBD vapes?

3 Likes

can’t really take anything the article says to heart if they’re using this garbage oil as input.

I don’t particularly understand why they used MCT oil at all, why not just vaporize the CBD?

6 Likes

I understand the logic to sample right from the cartridges. It’s answering ā€˜are these vapes safe’ more than ā€˜is CBD vapour safe’. But they should have tried 5-10 different vapes from the legal/medicinal market. Not some boof from a gas station.

1 Like

According to someone that supposedly has access to the study:

ā€œThey bought CBD from a company called The Kind Group LLC and mixed it with the MCT oil themselves.ā€

lmao! alright my bad for not reading that in the article. please tell me they performed the experiments on MCT oil alone too…

1 Like

It doesn’t mention that in the article, so you’re all good.

I would imagine they wouldn’t have to, last time I checked MCT oil aerosol inhalation has already been studied.

The study looks like it’s free too access by the way.

From the reading I did, the CBD vape already came diluted in MCT.

1 Like

WHY? Why would someone dilute something more for a study like this? And with an adulterant? What purpose does that serve?

1 Like

Obfuscation of information perhaps?

I’d hope it was unintentional, and they just assumed they would need a carrier for the CBD.

Best case scenario it’s just misinformed scientists, worst case it’s a hit piece.

1 Like

But like… if you know that these lipids are adulterants. And you know that those adulterants cause harms. When only looking for a product which contains adulterants seems kinda weird. I mean it could say ā€œadulterant laden CBD vape cartridges tested for lung damageā€ but that’s not what it says.

Like there’s been some really great studies on MCT and Vitamin E Acetate post E-VALI - why just disregard those… I mean, how does this help the science? Let us prove again that lipids are not supposed to go into the lungs. VOILA - we have confirmed the peer reviewed studies. <3 Yay!

Anyway - reading the article it totally gets things wrong from the report in the actual paper. Which happens a lot I suppose. The specifics being that the papers looks like this:

Which has propylene glycol and vegetable glycerin listed coming from the CBD-vape, not MCT. However, the narrative listed exactly the opposite of what the table in the same article lists. The marketing for the ā€œCalm Vapeā€ says that it doesn’t have any additives in it…

So I guess who should we believe at this point? The article, which misquotes the study. The study that misquotes itself. The manufacturer of the device? Hmmm.

I mean - I love science. But damn man, can’t we get a little more focus on accuracy in science for this stuff. People might start thinking its a good idea to fill vapes with plant lipids again or something…

5 Likes

image

6 Likes