I mean this man just took a bunch of products, ran GCMS scans, and broke down the compounds in them, complete with interesting observations on how the composition demonstrates the type of processing used. That would be an MOM worthy post if anyone else did it. Grade A, gold quality stuff. Yet instead, a bunch of whining that it wasn’t analyzed even further, and allegations of bad faith. I would ask every person criticizing here, have you ever contributed this much data to the forum yourself?
Your analysis is sufficient to put people in jail for sure but I don’t think it is conclusive that the cart you advertise as Perfect 10/10 is actually suitable for vaping.
We put this rating system together and our ID system was disclosed as people wanted to see official COA type stuff. Every analysis in the future will have this standardize report. It’s much easier for us too and I don’t want to miss anything.
An elaborate scam like providing data? Sure. By that token literally any scan posted by anyone could be a scam.
This is EXACTLY the process @ExtractNinja went through when he posted GCMS scans of viscosity he paid out of his own pockets to have done. A bunch of whiners saying “must be scam, must be scans of something else he’s just pretending is viscosity, must have a financial incentive”.