The O in THC-O is an acetate group, and when you heat that it tends to produce toxic ketene gas. That’s going to be the same for all cannabinoid acetates. Maybe you remember the vitamin-e acetates that hospitalized people from lung damage in nicotine vapes?
I’d leave that for edibles.
Game changer @Bret_HoneyGold D9 THC-O… I nominate you for COOL DUDE OF THE YEAR…
XD i nominate him for thca notification of the year.
Damn player how cheap and shitty are dem diamonds.
The fact you tryna sell shit when you know quality could knock on your door is beyond me.
Absolutely beyond me and disrespectful, but I am here to leave that in the past, and introduce some people to what true praise looks like changing supply
password is idgaf 
Cbd thca coa with zero explanation you thought would set customers straight. Lmfao how is this even a fucking thing? Id be paying to delete what looks like fraud
Can you post some pics of your best trimmed hemp flower that tests below .3% total thc
Are you familiar with any farms just producing Thca in bulk?
Not from the “hemp” industry.
Still do not get why folks do not isomerize cbd-a to thc-a
Real hemp derived end product
Many reasons, but mainly its financial and technical know how
Can you get the same enantiomers tho?
Free of semi-synthetics (exo-THC, etc) ?
Finding a CoA with <0.3%D9 THC for type 1 flower or isolated THCA isn’t the hard bit - that’s a trivial exercise. Any reputable lab wll be able to test these products and if they have been appropriately handled they will have minimal D9 THC.
All marijuana flower will have negligable D9 THC until heated or aged.
And pure THCA crystals will contain negligable D9 (or they would not crystallise)
Proving it’s “hemp” not marijuana is where you need some fast talking lawyers and a credulous audience.
High THCA flower won’t pass the definition of hemp in the farm bill (which requires <0.3% D9 THC by decarb testing at preharvest tests). If it doesn’t pass that test, it’s not hemp, it’s MJ, and is schedule 1 by definition, and is not protected by hemp regulations.
So you’re basically looking for a unicorn while insisting it looks like a horse on genetic testing. Easy to do with some suspension of disbelief. Your mileage may vary trying to convince regulators or law enforcement.
In practice “high thca hemp” vendors will show you a pre-harvest test done on hemp flower (if they do this at all) and a post harvest test done on the marijuana (ahem - “high THCa hemp”) without any mention of decarb or total D9 THCA.
What you won’t see is a real life pre-harvest test of a high THCA flower that passes the critical decarbed <0.3% D9 THC.
Without a pre-harvest test from the same batch of flower, all high THCA flower is known as marijuana by default.
This is actually the document you should insist on seeing from the specific variety and batch you are buying. Obviously these tests aren’t done because they would then require that crop was destroyed as required for hot hemp.
High THCA = fail on preharvest tests = hot hemp/marijuana.
Crystelization is purification
And can t tell for 100% but pretty sure it s clean
Thc -a d8 cocrystelizes but have not seen much else
I’m waiting for a methodology to come out that can accomplish this without creating too many abnormal forms of THCA
Conversion creates several stereoisomers not found in native cannabis.
IDGAF where the starting material came from if the end product isn’t exactly the same.