So what is the rule on selling disti with to much thc to other labs that are going to process it further?

CannaBusiness
, ,
42

I assure you this is not legal in the state of Kentucky. Material above 0.3% THC even if it is hemp derived it is considered to cannabis even if it transported from hemp license holder to hemp license holder. The legislatures and KDA do not understand that these processors even make a hot product if you extract a plant that is below 0.3% THC lol obviously the extractors know but not the lawmakers.

My experience in oregon, colorado, and washington it is typically ok though as long as everyone is licensed.

Long story short there is not an easy fast answer because the federal bill leaves you subject to laws of whatever state the material is located in during travel.

4 Likes
43

So your saying Kentucky labs are all liable to be raided cause every lab at some point or another has material that’s above .3% thc?

Guess I’ll be avoiding Kentucky.

But as long as the end state is not directly prosecuting then it’s cool? I imagine

44

I saw this yesterday

‘The USDA’s lawyers sided with Big Sky, saying that states “may not prohibit the interstate transportation or shipment of hemp lawfully produced under the 2014 Farm Bill.”’

Sounds like it’s up to your state for now. From what I understand since there’s no federal regulations one must be part of a states “pilot program” to grow or process hemp. And every pilot program is different.

Definitely safest to stick to intrastate transfer and wait on the interstate for now. Maybe we will hear different today?!

3 Likes
45

Well if you are transporting through kentucky or other states without a hemp program you must be liable.

Edit: I am not a lawyer so do not tell the cops some numbnuts on the internet told me this is okay lol

2 Likes
46

I am apart of my states pilot program. I have hemp from the only current allowed grower of hemp in Florida that is actually been federally recognized by agencies other then the department of ag. So if anyone’s gonna be able to sue to get it back it would be us. So not hugely scared honestly

1 Like
47

My friend just got a shipment taken in florida from a licensed supplier. With this kind of thing, until they tell us otherwise, it will be on a case by case basis. One thing here could bury you but there they dont care as much.

Its one thing to fight for what you believe in. Its another thing to look for a fight for what you believe in

Just be on the grind like we always have been and the bad eggs will darwin themselves out…

1 Like
48

https://realmoney.thestreet.com/investing/cannabis/the-usda-legalized-thc-but-no-one-noticed-14976778
The USDA also released a bulletin May 28 removing hemp derived THC from CSA

1 Like
49

Cause everything in Florida not derived under our pilot program through UF is illegal

1 Like
50

Florida has wacky rules. But like I said being associated with a DEA recognized pilot program and having products derived from it. I’ll be suing the shit out of LEO

51

So like even if it’s legally grown from Kentucky. If it comes to Florida it’s illegal cause it wasn’t sourced from OUR program. Welcome to politics where everyone’s an idiot and the rules don’t matter

2 Likes
52

What if thc gets rescheduled?

53

I saw this, kind of hilarious actually. The USDA heard that the THC schedulinf and regulation was hard to understand… They said hold my beer, we need to help.
federal laws were apparently to easy to reconcile lol

1 Like
54

I dont see where it says anything about THC in the bulletin although the article certainly implies that it says it

55

The only paragraph I can find in the bulletin referring to THC I attached below. It is Probably the paragraph that the article was referencing. What i think the author failed to realize that by referencing part 297A of AMA of 1946 defines hemp and all derivatives be below .3% THC

thc
thc1875×296 60.5 KB

hemp
hemp1181×951 422 KB