Bump!
Good morning Future fam
Bump!
Please send menu and recent COAs,
Pricing still the same?
Yessir. Shoot me your email and Iâll get that sent over for you
Happy Friday Future Fam!
Bump!
Hi there Tre
Can you ping me a DM here about ordering product from you from Europe
Thanks
Exactly who do you expect to offer âcompliance testingâ on D8?!?
Can you point to any statute that says âthou must test thy D8â? (Actually we may be at that point somewhereâŚI just donât recall whereâŚ)
So what on earth is there to comply WITH?
That it be hemp? Thatâs (apparently) about chain of custodyâŚbecause there is certainly no federal guidance on the subject.
Bump!
Lol maybe read before you jump my shit. That was only mentioned to demonstrate itâs a sloppy photocopy of the same COA for 2 separate batches.
COAs I was assured by Tre could be confirmed with the lab that has never even bothered to return an email less a phone call.
Iâm not jumping your shit. just pointing out that âinformational onlyâ is a perfectly normal appellation to find on ones D8/D10/HHC/TNC. Because there is no required testing beyond âinput tests as hempâ.
Ok, so you were using that part just to demonstrate these where photocopiesâŚothers reading along may well not be as savvy, and believe that there IS compliance testing for D8. Would you deny them that knowledge?
if you made 100kg batch, tested it, and sold it as individual kgâs, would you not photocopy the COA 99 times so as to provide one to each of those customers?
I sure as fuck would.
I have stuff tested on a weekly basis tooâŚbut that doesnât mean I go get a new COA on whatâs still on the shelf from last week. absolutely selling stuff that was tested more than two months ago. should COAâs expire? probably. I believe that has been implemented in at least one Rec market.
not saying you donât have cause. just pointing out that the practice of photocopying a COA is not, in and of itself, a crime against huge manatees.
cyclopath has more hours read on this site than anyone I can think of, off the top of my head. if they call you out for something, itâs best to assume that you are in the wrong before getting defensive.
Maybe if you used the search feature you would see the lab in question is far less than reputable, resides over 1000 miles away, and the dates on the poorly photocopied papers date months prior to the purchase.
Imagine someone asking if you had a COA for 2 separate orders as they were having issues with the product, and you pull out those papers as your proof only proof. They ask if you just photocopied the one from last time, is it a good time to inform them itâs for informational purposes only? Seems beside the point.
At least 4/5ths were destroyed as it couldnât be given away to anyone who had touched it. COAs aside the product spoke for itself.
âŚit never occurred to me to try that.
You seem to be under the misapprehension that Iâm saying your claims are baselessâŚIâm merely pointing out that some of the data points youâre using have other more innocent explanations.
Youâre right, I was. Thanks for pointing that out. Sorry I didnât really read your response initially, as itâs a sore subject that I donât really care to be involved in any further than I already have.
Bump!
Happy Friday Future Fam,
Bump!
Bump!
Happy Friday Future Fam,
Bump!
Good morning Future Fam,
Bump!
Happy Tuesday Future Fam,
Bump!