New OLCC rules for artificially derived cannabinoids and CRC

maybe a different name

The life moon, the life moon

3 Likes

You’re right tho last time we used the term death star to describe a lab it blew up pretty good

3 Likes

Attention grabbing. Your attention.

1 Like

It took weeks of pleading before I realized I just had to show them a jar. :call_me_hand:

1 Like

You’re the man @mitokid , keep it up bro.

1 Like

Think it was situational along the lines of asking why he got tagged.

You tagged him because he does good work, and you wanted to him to know that, in a public setting.

3 Likes

Mr. Crowley, Surprise and Thank You for your attention to the absurd.

1 Like

Wholeheartedly. Misread your intention.

Well good for you just thought I’d ask

I understand. I like my ESL on edge.

Grabbing someone’s attention not identical to seeking attention to yourself.

So now that I have someone’s attention, what is the main gripe with CRC’ed extracts, the fact that they may contain residual solvent?

1 Like

Well this just took a hard right turn

2 Likes

Yeah, it was really hard to cut through all the memery morass in an adjoining thread and I’m still not sure what I was looking at.

A simple Y/N to my question and I promise to log off…

waiting to read your next Senate bill.
perhaps you can include the hops industry???

Family Cannabinacea …was that one of your cuties?

FWI I put an end to that term.

1 Like

Didn’t Oregon ban non cannabis derived terpenes in the rec market?

I thought I saw somewhere they were talking about that or did it, I know they banned cutting agents

Yes, they did.

3 Likes

Isomerized terpenes = illegal

If

Cbd > d9/d8 is illegal

It’s only a matter of time before this gets brought up mark my words

1 Like

I’d say Reddit’s (not my) perception stems from trusting marketing & believing CRC is only used for unfit product.

2 Likes

That makes sense.

The road to the enlightened consumer is poorly maintained, steep, windy, and uphill. And not always paved with good intentions.

2 Likes