Did he say he wasn’t using yeast you said
Its in several of my PDFS on cannabiniod synthesis
I only know of the two routes so 
So, you made an assumption that was incorrect and got called out on it? I think that’s what you’re trying to say.
PSA: It’s ok to be wrong sometimes guys/gals. It’s when you don’t admit your faults that it gets awkward.
2 Likes
Derailed after 100 just like I thought. OK @Killa12345 you can move this to the EC or put a timer to it either way question has been answered, no need for more because it’ll end up an off topic shit storm.
looks borderline on topic…lets see where this one goes…
its an interesting arguement to say the least!
i think the various perceptions of synthetic vs semi synthetic is where this stems from. We can reclassify it if it gets much worse. but i think they need to define what is a synthetic and then go from there…which is were this is starting
7 Likes
Im Just using the info I have at hand and from talking to the guy you fucking jack wad, how do you know if he’s telling the truth or lying??? You can’t??? the stop getting bent because I can’t say for certain if he’s lying or not because as I already fucking said I don’t know for certain because I don’t work with him…
2 Likes
I’m a student, I’m not involved in cannabis on any level. Even if I was involved, have you read what I’ve been arguing? It is semi-synthetic which is obviously not a “natural” or “non-gmo” or whatever pharmaceutical buzzword that you use to oppose “fully synthetic.” From a chemistry standpoint, semi-synthetic is obviously synthetic. It’s in the word. What it is not is a total synthesis. I learned this in high school and I learned this again in college ten years later. I also said I’m not arguing about the legal definition, we all agree there is not a concise legal definition. Nor is it a pharmaceutical. I’m arguing about how the molecule is made and it is not “fully synthetic” because there is no such thing.
I avoid the echo chamber threads because I don’t care about the name calling and other bullshit here. I don’t appreciate the implication from multiple users that I’m autistic for trying to stop the spread of misinformation. I especially don’t appreciate that because I agree with @roiplek for once that it invalidates my argument. It’s perfectly alright if you’d rather stroke your ego, but don’t be upset when someone calls you out. 
2 Likes
Love you Willy.
1 Like
Okay guy 
there is actually a classification for synthetic cannabinoids but
Also please point out or reference anything that says im wrong
Semisynthesis, or partial chemical synthesis, is a type of chemical synthesis that uses chemical compounds isolated from natural sources (such as microbial cell cultures or plant material) as the starting materials to produce other novel compounds with distinct chemical and medicinal properties. The novel compounds generally have a high molecular weight or a complex molecular structure, more so than those produced by total synthesis from simple starting materials. Semisynthesis is a means of preparing many medicines more cheaply than by total synthesis since fewer chemical steps are necessary.
1 Like
Then why are both hu-331and hhu-345 classified as synthetic cannabinoids but are derived from CBD and CBN…
no hurries I can wait…
I said this in my last reply to you
From a chemistry standpoint, semi-synthetic is obviously synthetic. It’s in the word.
I argued about what “fully synthetic” means. That sounds like an unscientific buzzword.
They are classified as fully synthetic though…
Lol that was me who asked him.
1 Like
semi-synthetic.
ain’t nobody doing you for sure 
1 Like
I was wrong I guess hes just using CBDa
2 Likes
Lol I promise im getting it before you and your boof TLC paper
you’re the real winner because you always finish first
TLC plate you little shit
2 Likes