Hello all, I received some all-in-one/disposable vape samples. They are postless and I felt they smoked through the 1 ml fast, but tasted great. I took one apart, would yall call this a normal amount of residual condensation? Do you feel that the postless vapes go through the oil quicker?
Tastes great and runs out fast so custies have to come get another? Sounds perfect to me
8 Likes
Well do you know what the internals are?..
1 Like
Sorry, I just took it apart and took a picture of the tank. There was no leaking outside of the tank. If you’d like, I can dismantle another one and post a picture of the internals. I can also dm you the name of the model/company; I just dont want to publicly drag a company for what might be a fine product.
We’ve completed all other planning steps (including using yall to fill), but making a final decision on the vape hardware has been tough.
It seems to be on par to what I see inside of O2Vape’s horrid all glass so might just be condensation building up. I’m no expert just a cart peddler at heart, I have had devices build condensation up around the mouthpiece no idea what it pertains to exactly.
1 Like
Since the postless vape uses ceramic to adsorb and heat the cannabis oil, I think the main problem lies in the porosity of the ceramic. If the porosity is too large, the oil intake speed will be too fast. However, the voltage that is suitable for your cannabis oil cannot consume such a large amount of cannabis oil, resulting in incomplete atomization. The overly large cannabis oil molecules then deposit in the airway. There is also a possibility that the quality of the ceramic is not good, with inconsistent porosity. In areas where the porosity is large, the atomization is insufficient, leading to deposition.Of course, the material of the atomization core may not be ceramic, I just give an example
1 Like
