Georgia $150M class action lawsuit

elliot needs to chill and smoke some thca hemp lol

1 Like

My name is Connor, and I would rather just smoke the devil’s lettuce. Straight up. This obfuscation of compounds is just a problem where people will go to jail and the trappers might avoid time but probably get in trouble anyways. A quality producer doesnt need to engage in this type of fraud.

4 Likes

Y’all need some hobbies :joy:

6 Likes

That makes sense, the point is people have the right to know what they actually buy

1 Like

The same standard analytical methods are applied to determine whether this is hemp product or controlled cannabis. This is either GC without derivatization, which yields total THC, or HPLC, which sees thc and thca separately, but sums them as total thc on the report.

Nowhere I have seen specific standard procedure asking for separate thc and thca numbers . Any standard control of thca hemp will conclude this is plain cannabis.

7 Likes

YEAH BUT YOU FORGOT THAT ITS “THCa HEMP”

:man_facepalming:t2::man_facepalming:t2:
Thank you for this.

2 Likes


Want more? It’ll cost you 1$ per post
@ZizzleB :roll_eyes::shushing_face:

1 Like

Tennessee is an outlier with that legislation, but the dangerous drug task force seems to disagree with it. Isn’t there some rule making going on to stop it as well?

That also has no impact on interstate commerce. Honestly, I’m curious if the Rohrabacher-Farr amendment would cover that

1 Like

Like I said ill post you more examples for some $ my research skills dont come free, so the single state legislation you posted is all telling but mine is an outlier?

I didn’t make the argument that Oregon law extends everywhere. Oregon allows rec weed, they don’t allow it in interstate commerce yet

Wouldn’t this ultimately be decided by the federal interpretation of .3%D9THC post harvest? A state could say you cant ship into in but would have no say in federally lawful hemp passing through the state

States are allowed to impose stricter regulations…

Only to an extent…they cant impose on other state laws and they cant stop legal commerce from traveling through their state

2 Likes

Dea says it goes on post decarb numbers.

3 Likes

I’m aware THCa can be derived from hemp… I don’t think anyone argued that it could not. I know I didn’t, so not sure why you’re responding to me.

“THCa Hemp” is not a thing, dumbass.
It’s marketing words so people can operate through a legal loophole. and you know that, if you know anything about cannabis…

or maybe I’m giving you too much credit there.

1 Like

Except when it’s…negatively impacting the commerce of other states (Wickard v. Filburn), impacting public health, etc. See: alcohol, firearm, K2, kratom, COVID quarantine regulations.

5 Likes

Again, I WANT this cleared up. The question is, you get stopped transporting some cannabis sativa. It gets tested by a “post decarb method”, as the law requires, and by that method it’s like 15% d9. You argue that it passed the test one month pre-harvest and it is therefore hemp. If the courts agree, formally, then great, this is fine for everyone, we got weed legalized federally. I would LOVE that. On the other hand they might say that what you’re holding isn’t hemp because it doesn’t meet the 0.3% d9 threshold defined post-decarb and they don’t care what it was like a month before harvest. Then everyone involved are felons. It would be nice to see this issue settled once and for all, beyond all appeal, because that’s a big freaking difference!

16 Likes

8 Likes

Its shows total thc but differenciates between thca and delta 9.

This is what is accepted by the banks and payment processors.

This is also the reson why there have been multiple instances of people getting there bud returned due to the delta 9 levels.

Im not going to beat a dead horse. There are clearly those who are for and aganist it.

The only people who are against this arent actually involved in the industry.

1 Like