General drug news/discussion

Being ignored and manipulated by democrats that’s what’s happening.

Bro I think once you realize what is really happening you just like I did in the past will be disgusted with what you see happening on the left. Like I said before what was the left once would now be considered an extreme right wing. What is the left today is a mess. Don’t get me wrong I think most Republicans are garbage as well.

I think ill take my chances with 2 packs of gas station boner pills vs 4 more yrs of this fn BS we live in now.

2 Likes

So you asked a chat bot. That’s real fucking smart.

Your answer showed up on the second result if you asked a search engine. But you don’t know how to cite a fucking source

1 Like

Instead of being a jackass why don’t you enlighten us with some facts?
Switch to decaf dude you’re way too amped up. If you have different evidence than I do go ahead and present it.

Harris oversaw more than 1,900 marijuana convictions in San Francisco, previously unreported records from the DA’s office show. Her prosecutors appear to have convicted people on marijuana charges at a higher rate than under her predecessor, based on data about marijuana arrests in the city.
But former lawyers in Harris’ office and defense attorneys who worked on drug cases say most defendants arrested for low-level pot possession were never locked up. And only a few dozen people were sent to state prison for marijuana convictions under Harris’ tenure.
[…]
Over Harris’ seven years as top prosecutor, her attorneys won 1,956 misdemeanor and felony convictions for marijuana possession, cultivation, or sale, according to data from the DA’s office. That includes people who were convicted of marijuana offenses and more serious crimes at the same time.

Harris oversaw roughly 1,956 misdemeanor and felony convictions for “marijuana possession, cultivation, or sale,” according to Reuters . However, defense attorneys and prosecutors in Harris’ office told Mercury News that most of the people convicted during this period did not serve jail time. And convictions for marijuana did go down under Harris’ tenure as district attorney.

simple possession was decriminalized when she became AG as well
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/sen/sb_1401-1450/sb_1449_bill_20100930_chaptered.html

Existing law provides that, except as authorized by law, every
person who possesses not more than 28.5 grams of marijuana, other
than concentrated cannabis, is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be
punished by a fine of not more than $100. This same penalty is
imposed for the crime of possessing not more than 28.5 grams of
marijuana while driving on a highway or on lands, as specified.
[…]
This bill would provide that any person who commits any of the
above offenses is instead guilty of an infraction punishable by a
fine of not more than $100. This bill would eliminate the
above-described provisions relating to booking and to diversion and
referral for education, treatment, or rehabilitation.

only 45 people were sentenced to state prison for marijuana convictions during Harris’ seven years in office

for her tenure as DA in San Francisco

1 Like

Thank you. I appreciate you taking the time to give a coherent response. After you responded I decided to look up some of the articles I distinctly remember reading about her record that point in the completely different direction but Google and duck duck go give me almost nothing but leftist media now and appear to have scrubbed any negative article about Harris out of there search engines. It is actually amazing to see the lengths that they’re willing to go to. I cannot remember where all the articles I’ve read in the past were from and without Google or other search engine help it is very difficult to dig it up right now. I guess I could spring for the $10 it cost to become a member on X / Twitter so that I get access to be able to use Groke so that I may have a neutral search engine to help me along.

1 Like

idk about editing the search output, rastroturfing/SEO are also big factors on search results. The topics of the role algorithms play and personalized search results are another matter

it looks like the origin of the claim is Tulsi Gabbard making a misrepresentation during a VP debate, I can’t find anything beyond that. No one I’ve asked can name a single person who actually went to prison for simple possession

The statistics are difficult. Simple possession is charged as distribution when one possesses enough. And as far as who went to prison for what, I would think a lot of people who got probation would fvck it up somehow, flunk a drug test, miss a court appearance, piss off your parole officer and ultimately end up in prison, but be counted as a parole violation.

3 Likes

All this stuff aside im surprised how many people still believe them or have any confidence in anything they say or do. If you cant even hold a conversation thats a problem, no one is perfect and me personally i think the death nail was hit a while ago for this country as we knew or know it and trump has only delayed the inevitable. When he wins, I think it will just put off what was supposed to go down with Hillary.

People also go back to prison for alcohol if they can’t abide by their release conditions, I’m curious what those numbers are like

1 Like

My neighbor once gave me a box of liquor bottles because her incarcerated husband was getting home confinement and one of the terms was no alcohol in the house, even though he was in jail for weed and his charges had nothing to do with booze. They also had to have a land line phone.

A girlfriend of mine in school did a ridealong with cops who were rounding up parole violators. One common violation was talking to people who were deemed part of your crime. It might be lifelong friends or even family, but if they catch you around them, it’s back to jail for you.

Did you watch infowars on Sunday? Alex Jones had an interview with chat GPT and exposed it for being a tool of the globalist lizard people.

1 Like

I’ve never watched info war. Not even once.

Alex Jones is a national treasure. We need to defend him at all costs.

1 Like