I’d like to know if its some of the makeup of unknowns after conversions. A guy told me it was supposed to be far more psychoactive than D9- and I have noticed some D8 distillates with low purity can often be very strong despite low percentages (70s anyway)
@nostrum The discussion on d6a10a being more psychoactive than d9 THC can be found but they’re very subjective. The information you’re probably thinking of is in reference to the d6a10a THC with a penta-heptyl tail is the most psychoactive of the 6a10a THC (d3) configurations tested. However the old masters seemed in disagreement if it really compared to d1 (d9). Here’s a clip of some old discussion
Have you seen alex siegel’s video on d10 synthetic byproducts, the +,+THC stereoisomer? he mentioned it’s not very easy to detect the stereoisomers using standard analytical equipment.
Have you looked at the boiling points of the d10 isomers? One has a 20 degree higher boiling point, that could mean its more stable and can be separated possibly by a standard column and method (if its truly more stable and not a misprint)
Also,
With an MS and the right column you can easily seperate chiral molecules and detect them
The alcohol analite you look for in urine when doing drug testing is chiral and you sepetate it with a special column
@Kingofthekush420, as you know, we test for d10 as well, but we don’t see it nearly as often. Unfortunately, this method wasn’t designed to separate out stereoisomers. A chiral method is in the works.
No, but I’m not talking about d10 stereoisomers, I’m referring to d9 stereoisomers. if you watched the vid (I’d highly recommend) you’d know that d9 to d10 is reversible, amd when it does revert to d9 it makes a 50/50 mix of (-) and (+) isomers of d9 which using normal analytical they cant resolve.