It was confirmed that there was almost 10% delta 10 in my sample. The disty was made from 2 different batches.
Batch 1: no idea where the trim came from and I do have a small amount of the crude left
Batch 2: trim was definitely outdoor norcal, no crude left but I do have some of the trim left
I can send a sample of the disty, the crude from the first batch, and would it help to send the trim from the second batch?
Maybe, have you all deduced the structure by 1-d and 2-d nmr? In other words, how certain are you the chemical you have matches reported chemical structure. In addition to your certainty or whomevers certainty be aware I will hold you accountable of your suspicions lol.
We donât. From the NMR we can tell which isomer Nug isolated. From my understanding it shouldnât be a problem for our LC testing. Enantiomers absorb light the same so we should be able to quantify âd10 THCâ and be as correct as a lab labeling âd8 THCâ.
@drjackhughes has figured out how to separate d10 isomers on GC and presented on the topic at microscopes and machines
I would help how I could. A paper I posted in the data dump the other day is a pretty good review of most of the semi-synthetics made but there are so many.
d8 and (possible d10 still waiting on testing) are nothing like d9 and IME (and many others) they require double the dose for similar effect when eaten and even then the high is different
@extractepic said d10 hits harder when eaten then d9.
@shadownaught said he smoked some before bed and had the gnarliest dreams ever
@Jerefuckinmiah smoked some and said he could see himself switching to d10 one day when older, he said it decreased his need for cannabinoids throughout the day, normally hes always looking for something to smoke the d10 had him chillin thinking about life
I jumped the gun I am still waiting on the official test from @AlexSiegel to determine what the unidentified isomers are I am assuming d10 but I may be wrong so I will edit that post