why dont you make me???
why cant you answer these questions genius??
you see who gets all mad with this argument everytime?? keep it up
1 Like
I care a ton about people in d8 and look up to a ton of the science taking place. I consume and try products. Respectfully. I just know what will happen to the average Joe who tries to flip carts in an illegal state. I also don’t want my friends having burnt rubber dabs.
This has always been about doing better but we cant raise the bar without dogging on those who refuse not to.
1 Like
Lmao youre not ready bro, I bet you’re a hider (which wouldn’t help as youre a business entity, dont get me started on that)
Because you can’t answer a question like this!
isolate is made by extacting cbd legally from .3% or under cannabis sativa. ok now answer mine??
and i could careless about the business as said plenty of times here…wanna test the theory??? why are you sooo mad
you just cant answerr the hard questions…
i didnt quite see this before…your calling me boy??? your smaller than my 15 year old. Boy! gain about 50lbs and grow a few inches…LOL BOY your a funny guy!~
I’m not high enough for this …
Kinda glad I’m just a rosin kid with no claim to this stuff. The day I get to be a student remind me I don’t know shit. Because I’ll be on here probably studying and asking stupid questions. I’m over here still like ooo hash ooo diamonds ooo sciencey cbd
6 Likes
You didn’t answer the whole question
Why are you bitching if when you concentrate it it goes above .3% d9?
Have you ever seen someone extract CBD (not cbg!) And it still be under .3% d9
I’ll wait
Wip Extracts apply but do they apply to products sold?
im not bitching…just explaining its now marijunana not hemp and you mine as well just break the law all the way if your gonna hid behind the false pretense your working with hemp…
Im not around fake weed so i dont know. i just know what the law states and its the opposite of what you say. SOrry that we are both on a public forum sharing our sides… WHy so butt hurt?? LOL cause this is how you make money???
you already shared your view of my mickey mouse extractors…LOL
i dont take it personal. you certainly are though??/
So you admit you’re not in the hemp industry yet somehow you’re attempting to be a lawyer and know it all
Stick to SS and absorbent and let the hemp boys who are ACTUALLY in the industry do the real work 
1 Like
dont you mean the “low thc cannabis sativa” boys that are shipping controlled substances across state lines???
if thats “real worK” i must be crazy!
Most isolate is made with distillate that’s hotter than the d8 that’s out now and a chemical to make the idolate:sob:
The same chemical you run over your organic weed to make your butane soups
4 Likes
Alright man, we’ve all seen it. Problem with this argument (agaiinnnnn) is that there’s another document that this pertains to that does actually matter and affect the way this law is enforced. Read the hemp bill again, it’s exempt from the CSA if it’s under .3 D9. That includes ALL ISOMERS. It says it right in there for all to see. That means Delta-8 THC distillate with less than .3% D9 is hemp. Is it a loophole? Fine, sure. If the D8 is hot, it’s illegal. If it’s under .3 D9, it’s legal. It’s in plain English. If the jurisdiction of hemp changes, or if the IFR actually mentions hemp derived D8 AND it becomes law- which it has not, and requires congressional approval (that time is not now)- then they will amend the hemp laws (although the DEA is actually the ones who amended THIER law to accommodate the USDA). We can’t tell hundreds of labs that there’s 2 or 3 that are right and they’re wrong, and then force the methods on them, that’s for the DEA and the USDA to do, and THEY WILL, and then everything will begin to work itself out. Whichever way the DEA and USDA see it is the way it will go. If the chemists with the superior methods want to reach out and work with the DEA then that’s what they can do to change the analytical industry. I don’t know the them, they might like it, or they might say “thanks but no thanks”. I don’t know. I personally think there is enough evidence/data on both sides of the coin that it’s not as clear cut as people say it is that it’s actually D9. People don’t like that there is ambiguity, and they aren’t willing to look at both perspectives. I have limited analytical chemistry experience, so from here it looks like it could be D9, or maybe it’s not. I have actually talked to more than 1 chemist about it, though, and they do not all think that they can say 100% that it’s one way or the other. The conversation should be "how can we make this better and actually make compliant, safe, and scalable D8. This is the problem with these threads- same shit over and over with no movement forward. It’s cannabis regulatory Groundhog’s Day all day every day around here.
3 Likes
I take all perspectives. Hell I just ate d8 chocolates to sample for one of my business partners separate hemp entity. Happy to be a consumer. Happy that people have something versus nothing. But this is like mexican brick weed when we have the fire available. The same fine applies. I also agree, if we started seeing more compliant product (not just 1 kca verified) we’d have less to worry about.
I just know if it’s not a diluted finished product, or sold as wip to another person to finish making final product with it could be an issue for a business.
2 Likes
yeah, agreed- I think it would be so great to get it to a point where people in states with no access to D9 could still get medicated. We don’t spend much time talking about those aspects- like I would totally use a D9 edible for my anxiety, depression, and pain issues if my job didn’t require me to be upright and awake instead of talking to the computer and trying to change a podcast with a light switch. I do know from actual real life accounts, though that D8 has been a godsend for some- especially when properly formulated with other cannabinoids. There are actually people that use it for something other than posting Karen reviews on reddit- I mean they were probably doing reviews on research chemicals and nootropics you kinda feel before the D8 craze, but that’s another story
1 Like
Just for the ole shits and gigs, I would argue that there are plenty of landrace/wild strains that are naturally low in THC, like ruderalis strains- which is where all this started anyways (aside from the folks who isolated the pheno from the cannatonic variety, which is naturally low by a rate of 25% of seeds germinated- can’t remember the lineage prior to that), so if we’re talking about the plants, I wouldn’t call it fake weed. I would call it CBD dominant cultivars. D8 sprayed flower? Pencil shavings in a bag? Perhaps… For the intent and purpose of the American Government, however, it’s all Cannabis Sativa. An interesting note, however, on ruderalis, some experts do not consider ruderalis to be a subspecies of Cannabis Sativa, but rather it’s own species known as Cannabis Ruderalis. Depends on who you talk to (or answer to)
1 Like
you talk like it’s an elite cadre when it’s basically nothing more than stoners jerking each other off for accomplishing fuck all
now it’s a party!
3 Likes
yeehaw
1 Like
I would much rather let @kcalabs start their own thread and pin that, let them lay claim and reap the rewards of being the first and only, who seems to not have a problem transparently sharing their results. HashFight will be fun, LabWars is gonna be the bombdotcom.
6 Likes