The guy that don’t know Büchner funnels and dcvc!! You know that guy. The one dude… 
Sorry I’m just excited as I might buy myself a jetski tomorrow for Christmas
4 Likes
How is it different friend? crc is a form of chromatography, and as I’ve previously stated dcvc chromatography uses vacuum only. Proving that vacuum can pull solvent through a column of media.
The fact that you don’t understand the difference and why we are talking about it proves the fucking point. We are running a time efficient operation over here…I’m not sure what your doing.
I cannot speak on the difference in speed (if any) .Ken stated( rather admittedly)vacuum cannot pull through and I was simply correcting him.
He was saying because of the application, the dudes input is irrelevant, which is correct.
4 Likes
He also stated…
3 Likes
Do you really think a vacuum is slow?
"DCVC is an old method that has most recently been reported with an improved
procedure by Daniel Sejer Pedersen.1 This guide is an elaboration of this methodology
with some improvements in sample loading and choice of solvent gradient. Using this
type of column chromatography it is possible to routinely separate with a better than
TLC resolution. The method is very scalable and has been used to separate more
than 150 g of compound per column. Generally it is faster, uses less solvent, less silica
and has better resolution than Flash Chromatography. "
“In conclusion, DCVC provides a robust, fast and economical method for large as well as small scale separations. In addition, the technique is superior in resolution power to Flash Column Chromatography because of the reduced diffusion during chromatographic separation. This means that each compound elutes in fewer fractions and that less cross contamination of fractions is observed.”
HOLY SHIT MAN!!! Yes? You’re right? Will you shut the fuck up now?
Sorry that was directed @Saucysanchez775
Fuck…I’m going to quote myself here in a second.
2 Likes
He just has no clue what you’re talking about…
2 Likes
I know. That’s why its frustrating. He is talking about a different process entirely having no experience with the one in question
2 Likes
Crc is solvent passing through media to purify .
Chromatography is literally the same thing so how is it different? Your answer was …speed than I debunked that. So now you’ve all resorted to name calling. Lol the emotional I will never understand.crabs in a bucket
2 Likes
. . .
What does C R C stand for
Color Remediation Cartridge.
When it does more than color Remediation…
So, you’re right. Yes it does a form of Chromatography.
Maybe CRC needs updating to Chromatography Remediation Cartridge.
Does this please ?
Still taste like shit so… Stay on topic
1 Like
Sharing irrelevant info is not debunking.
Why are you so passionately wrong about something you can’t speak on? Humble yourself.
Give us your input when you have personal experience with it.
3 Likes
Happy to share the digits, but you gotta accept DMs first. Haha.
1 Like
The second “C” is for “Chromatography”
“Color Remediation Chromatography”
10 Likes
I think it really depends on the context of the acronym. @cyclopath has a Canadian Rally Championship jacket that uses the acronym CRC. It’s a sweet jacket. Lol.
In this case, though, I’m with you, @TheGratefulPhil. CRC in regards to extraction stands for color remediation chromatography, even if it isn’t the textbook standard for chromatography. First time I said that to Cyclo, he looked at me funny, and only after he thought about it did he seem to, begrudgingly, agree.
Like everything cannabis, there seems to be some discrepancies when it comes to appropriate and accurate nomenclature. 
7 Likes
It’s the fucking application…not a word…chromatography. If you haven’t done the magical dirt inline to cleany uppy the sticky icky then you cant explain how to properly apply the process.
It is chromatography. We know this. Extreme speed chromatography, running high volumes of oil laden solvent as fast as the powders will allow while still doing their job. When you run a chromatography column, do you time it every time and try and beat that time the following round? Do you strive for efficiency in regards to time or no?
2 Likes
Is this response to me or someone else?
2 Likes
Its to anyone listing to this ridiculous banter about semantics and how not having experience doing the discussed process can make someone look silly. So no, not directed at you. My rantings started about pressure differentials required for acceptable flow when implementing a b80 CRC.
I’ve spoken plenty on the topic. If you’re getting W1 flow out of B80 tell us where you’re sourcing this sieved bentonite that the rest of us aren’t getting. I’m out.
5 Likes