What u guys thinking about this coaš§
Iām thinking itās a doctored coa. Itās weird not to have any cbd at all in either conventional or conversion.
Just Cbg and d9. Thatās weird and resembles conventional but itās super weird to have nd for cbd on either option
2 Likes
Resolution alone looks like a COA taken from Google images, and possibly doctored in post
This test does not show sufficient information to determine if it is a conversion product or not.
1 Like
Have you tried verifying it using the QR code so it shows the original on their site? Iām sure thereās a way to scan a QR code from an image but you could just print a copy and scan it.
Numbers look like it could go either way. Wouldnāt be hard to add a dash of CBG to make it look like it contains minors. Those would be the first two things Iād expect to always show up on THC flower since many THC genetics do produce much more CBG than CBD. Iād check it out on the site before anything.
Edit: The QR code seems too distorted to be readable. The imagine quality may very well have been wrecked in the process of taking a screenshot, sending it, uploading it here, etc but the same will often happen if it was edited in PS. I wouldnāt jump to the conclusion it was that but Iād definitely request the original PDF file and verify the COA on the labās portal before trying to make any other assumptions.
3 Likes
If the starting material employed was CBD isolate (which wonāt have anything other than CBD; and which is usually employed for the said conversion), and the conversion was 100%, leaving no CBD behind, then the only cannabinoids present would be the ones which would potentially be derived from CBD under the reaction conditions (viz. Īā¹-THC, Īāø-THC, possibly some CBN). CBD wonāt convert to CBG, under the reaction conditions which are usually employed for CBD ā Īā¹-THC conversion. Soā¦
1 Like
ā¦it was added after?
This test doesnāt check the right cannabinoids to answer the question definitively.
1 Like