I wasn’t aware IGNORE was an option but since you pointed it out I am definitely using it for King of the Criticism because I’d like to enjoy the more positive aspect of constructive interactions and feedback on the forum as opposed to the insecure and malicious keyboard warrior mentality. @anon42519203 as always we appreciate your contributions to the community and openess with your tech. Blessings!
8 Likes
@sidco can we please make this a new topic to provide this user the answers they seek while keeping this thread on topic? Please delete this request message after redirecting his post if you would sir 
Don’t talk shit, be fake or lie and you won’t have a problem.
I can still bust out that email and prove you’re a liar about the #s at Extractech lol
Don’t get sauce now. You started it
And remember who bitched up when I got in your face at Extractech, you’re lucky I didn’t whoop your ass in front of your lady for disrespecting a female
2 Likes
6 Likes
Seriously though , let’s just talk tech. The cat fights are out of control.
10 Likes
Ppl want to take side shots through out this thread then bitch up when I see them at events
Meanwhile I’m at 1.9 microns on this wiper
4 Likes
Does that system have the outlet to the traps oriented on the top or bottom of the wiper jacket? Perfect vacuum, can you share your temps and feed speeds?
1 Like
Outlet is at the bottom which is better IMO
You get better condensing power since the vapor is pulled passed the condenser which doesn’t happen when the cold trap is up top. I run my feed temp 20 to 30 degrees lower then my evaporator temp, when you do this with the cold trap up top any heads/terpenes will just fly by missing the condenser going straight to the cold trap.
178 evaporator temp, 70 on the condenser 5 lph
I’ll be releasing the 1 pass SOP to the glg soon which will utilize hot condenser to skip the terp strip (you will need a roto or reactor for this sop) it will also use a nomograph to help ppl figure out there exact evaporation temp for thc which will allow them to figure out exactly what temp you need to run your condenser at
Like I’ve been saying its all about stripping out ALL the heads and terpenes before you do your main body pass. If you do this there will be nothing in there for the condenser to condense but disty no matter what the temp
Ppl (like BreakingDabs) say that wiped film disty is much more runny compared to spd disty. That’s ONLY if you have heads and terpenes in there. A wiper will always give you better separation then an SPD if ran correctly because it’s a thinner film which allows for less codistillation and better separation.
2 Likes
So essentially just going to punch out anything the condenser can pick up via decarb and heat. Then you can run a hot jacket and a hot condenser one time.
95% 1 pass , 190/130 jacket. Definitely room for improvement. But that’s what I’ve been getting.
As for the nomograph, it’s more of a computational algorithm than a straight graph. For instance the dynamics of varying temperature within the main body, what’s the temperature of the room, how quickly does temperature and vacuum fluctuate.
Also if you think about the time it takesthe crude to heat as it wipes through the jacket and the heat transfer that occurs.
There are lots of mathematical inputs here. Something I’ve been playing with a little bit and making software out if.
2 Likes
It’s there for anyone who wants to see
I already hit below 0.075 micron on my wiper… really man… go away. My entire post said i was running below 0.75mtorr after the cold trap and maintaining that through mains removal… my gauge bottomed out, or id show you how big my dick really is. Seriously man. My post. Stop.
3 Likes
were going for quality here. So its definitely not single pass conversation going on. This will require 2-3 passes in total depending on how the material is approached before the wiper… so any talk about “single pass” i am going to ignore, as well as please ignore all king of the cutter remarks about my opinions or how i do things. He has no right to speak for me… and has no fucking clue based on what he says.
Also, wont tolerate talk about “whooping someones ass” especially since the boy talking is a buck ten wet… get out of here with this shit.
If youre going to talk shop, i can respect that… be king of the kush… not king of the cutters and criticism… people give you nicknames for a reason man… be better then that… dont be a bitch… . Youve been warned multiple times
2 Likes
Does 190/130 mean jacket 190 condenser 130?
Feel free to send us a test to verify that 95%. That’s some single pass magic! If you want to show off send the feed stock too and we will test it free.
I get kind of confused about what a “pass” is going from SPD to wiper. It seems like people sometimes count the volatile removal as a full pass while others don’t. If you don’t mind I ask, what’s your input to the single pass like?
4 Likes
@Alexsiegel94 95% total cannabs. Not THC. It’s all gone now. But was tested by another member on the forum here through a lab… I’ll see if I can name drop him and he can concur. I don’t just want to tag him.
Alex yessir, 190 jacket, 130 condenser. Get the conditions right and the flow is insane too.
As @Kingofthekush420 alluded earlier. If you want that quality and only want to run it through the wiper once, you pretty much have to burn off a lot of the garbage, then you are only condensing cannabinois, mostly. The thing I’ve seen though, the color is good enough. I’m sure someone else can do it even better than me.
I personally think with hot condenser you should pass it through the wiper a couple times. Especially for aesthetics.
Input material was bucket tek crude with some preparation.
3 Likes
Never forget whos the king of depth… ones a wiper (albeit dry) and the other is an spd during mains… … come swinging Your tiny pecker in here… and telling people about whopping their ass in front of their “lady”
Bitch please… cant wait for the next glg. Omerta
2 Likes
Cbd run done on ethanol material, one volatiles pass at high temp of 160/100 (higher isnt achievable with their heat transfer fluids)
0.2 torr during volatiles
Then cannabinoid removal at 160/100 at 0.09torr.
Final pass shown here at 160/100 0.004torr
This is their cold trap after they changed parameters and reran some of their material at these higher temps. Alot of heads removal, theyre finally within their target potency.
Results so far showing an 8-10% potency increase so far. On old material theyre rerunning to test these new sops.
The material in the top picture is currently running, potency tests should come later today or tomorrow hopefully. This is a brand new batch taken through the entire process method so well see how much of a potency increase we get there. They were testing at ~78%. We took the first batch of older material up to ~86%.
I havebw concern they still have lipids in the material which may account for more potency change once we fix their extraction sop.
Final jar view
I miss read the original test… We didn’t just bring their total cannabinoid from 78%… We actually made total cannabinoid 95%… With total CBD 86%… So right within that parameter that you were doing already
3 Likes
It’s definitely possible to achieve 95% TAC in one distillation pass after the deterping/head strip. This is a CoA on our “Second Pass” (1st being deterp/head strip) distillate at 165/95 showing ~94% TAC.
If you’re talking about “one pass” in the sense that you only run it though once with no deterping or head strip, then sorry I misunderstood.
1 Like
Can i ask what you do your terp strip at? And ya that counts as a pass as it requires time on the machine
1 Like
Nice. Do you have starting material testing on the same sample? That’s some pure distillate.
1 Like
