Bullshit call electrical union in reno its 5 years 3 years if you wanna learn fire alarm and data cables call carpenters union its 4 years sheet metal 4 years
I understand that.
What job in the cannabis industry falls within these parameters? I am unaware of any and look forward to learning
It was an example to show how much better trained union workers are. Obviously a cannabis apprenticeship should only be 2 years
I watched 3 close friends go through it not only for building the raiders stadium in Vegas but for framing out here. As well as others that went just for working for higher pay in the pipeline here too.
Why is that, obvious, that it should only be 2 years? Whats your reasoning?
It only illustrates someone signed off on the paperwork. Doesnât actually mean the person is more qualified than a non-union individual with similar experience.
Tou can test into the union if tou have 8000 hours work experience and 8f tou pass a written and practical test. This is if work is in high demand like in the case of the stadium or the pipeline otherwise the apprenticeship is 4 to 5 years.
4 years for extraction. 4 for cultivation 2 for budtending and other areas that dont require as much skill
Unions stop companies from exploiting their workers is the most important part. And they stay competitive by being better trained and work more effectively and produce a better product. Thatâs the summary
Not even a hard google search to show the âdo no evilâ aspects of unions not quite working out that way.
Nothing about a union contributes to this. Certifications can accomplish much the same, often with about as much credibilityâŚ
âBetter trainedâ - debatable. Is a green nose fresh out the farm better trained learning the bad habits of a journeymen they learned from?
âWork more effectivelyâ - nothing about hourly promotes working more effectively. Nothing about a union contributes to this that otherwise couldnât exist without said union.
âProduce a better productâ - debatable. See first point.
This argument is obviously not going anywhere you completely ignored all the points a made to back up my case itâs not worth REPEATING MYSELF
Your points are all easily refuted. You come across like an advertisement for unions. Like theyâre some benevolent force of incorruptible good.
They are not.
I did not ignore your points. I deconstructed your argument nearly line by line to illustrate my reasoning. You offer no counter arguments?
This is what I am saying you are ignoring half of what Iâm saying. Iâm done babysitting.
Youâre referencing a posting not in the context of this argument between you and I.
That being said, you admitting âOften they get corruptedâ does not constitute âignoring half of what youâre sayingâ.
If I missed something, please elaborate.
If this is as hard as youâre willing to work for something you believe in, well, I am disappointed.
Tou didnât even watch it you wrote back quicker than the clip is come in hey itâs funny and u need it
Do you want to post meme videos all night or would you like to have a useful conversation?
Iâm not interested in a meme-off on this discussion.
Truly, Iâm sorry youâre not interested in taking the conversation seriously, it was interesting.
Hereâs a bunch of reasons unions have failed, might be worth reading to know what pitfalls to avoid