Edit: sorry, links are to the full rules. not just the testing rules…but it’s really the testing that matters most to those extracting imo. your mileage may of course vary.
may not be required reading in your jurisdiction. seem like pretty standard fare. I’m sure there are things in there I’d be concerned about if I actually had to play by them.
If you’ve read/played by the CA rules before, this version might just be the changes & a faster read.
However, something caught my eye on page 105. Specifically the action levels for bifenthrin. It’s not the only one where the action level is higher in vaporizable products than other cannabis products, but it does stand out from the arbitrary 0.1ppm “standard” for other pesticides in like products.
looks like a financially based rather than consumer health focused decision to me. guess that shouldn’t be a surprise.
Edit: also surprised that one can fail for having more terpenes than the label lays claim to…but not for having less than the label claims. I think somebody missed the point…
It is accepting to have one peice of "mammal excrement " per 3 grams of material! (Dosent differentiate between a dog turd weighing 1/4 lb vs rat turd weighing grams.
I assumed the skimpy costumes and lewd behaviour would probably self extinguish once the camera’s came online. Guess CA figures some of you lot for exhibitionists.
