Lol and people think I’m an asshole.
There’s levels to shit talking.
![]()
![]()
Lol and people think I’m an asshole.
There’s levels to shit talking.
![]()
![]()
You mean the thread where the author agreed with me and wanted to change the title because I was right the entire time. That one?
You’re so extremely vapid, it’s painful. You should go back to being a street dog and go play in traffic.
Not a single person disagreed with me, you should stop smoking crack.
Common sense isn’t so common with that one. I shouldn’t have even given him the energy after asking him a question that I know he can’t answer, anyway.
This topic is so very important. This is a timely, urgent, expensive issue. I appreciate it when the level of discourse reflects the seriousness of the item at hand.
Game sees game
You’re a fucking fool. You think I have an unopened tank with 1 lot number and 6 from a different lot? @Fyourmisinformation quite literally fuck your misinformation sir ![]()
You are literally the definition of logical fallacies and you sir have earned my second ever ignore on future4200
Something that makes me feel like the gas people know what’s going on is because places with much stricter limitations to things like methanol aren’t seeing the gas issues. The PPM allowance in places like CA are much more forgiving and I think that’s why trace amounts are just now finally being found. Samples that were testing fine in CA are being sent to CO where it’s popping up in tests. And funny enough I haven’t heard of anyone in Colorado with this issue. It’s almost like they know what states are able to see it and what aren’t on testing which would be so savage.
You just haven’t heard of it happening from some prolific accounts based out of Colorado. It’s definitely happening in Colorado.
I see what you mean here but I don’t like prolific extractors haha that’s a cool kids club I’m cool being out of: I’m originally from Colorado and reached out to a few, but can’t say I reached out to them all
XD but? You don’t use soap and water? Alright I’m doneeee
I’m glad I don’t fall into this category. I guess you had to start on Facebook eating crayons to qualify.
Shots fired ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
don’t you love em?
19 posts were split to a new topic: Street dog getting ran over
Is there shit talk remediation needing to be done!? I’ve heard of that place before!!
Thanks @FicklePickle ![]()
Back to the subject at hand
After chatting with @moronnabis he had an excellent point. Due to DEA not crashing out at a molar ratio we are likely looking at a crystallization catalyst instead of true “salting out”.
@Photon_noir what do you think?
A post was merged into an existing topic: Street dog getting ran over
No i said i had no clue and iwas open to any facts. I said post the picture, and you respond with something i did not say , nor did u show the picture to prove me wrong?
yousaid i was the one ignoring/dodging questions. What did you there ![]()
I responded with
English is hard but he understands the science behind the secret no one could “discover” lol.
[quote=“Fyourmisinformation, post:317, topic:179276”]
Its funny you have 5 likers who agreed with what u said there about me “saying it was from different lots” when there is no where u can quote that and u can check the edits. someone else commenting on wagering that they were all from the same lot, people have different names im not sk8nmidget ;). i just said show a picture but i assumed that 1 was from a different lot from the other? and to the 5 people that agreed with that read the quotes… Keep proving my point about your lack of understanding, your so biased against me youll like something that is quoted and showed wrong. Pathetic Spineless, think for yourselves. Its ok if u dont get likes <33. now thats trash talking
THese quotes were directly relevant to me being accused of something someone else stated, WHy are you hiding my defense but not their accusation?
A post was merged into an existing topic: Street dog getting ran over