Because they are legislators, not chemists. Once they learn what they don’t know, their tune will change.
LOL…“synthetic” vs. “artificial” is due to laymen vs. expert. Simple as that.
But, please tell the Feds that OR said D8 is an “artificial cannabiniod” so all is good 
Diction is everything, like I said they didn’t call it a synthetic cannabinoid for a reason.
Funny you’re trying to argue when this article is specifically pointing out there’s a loophole for d8 and that its valid which is why they’re regulating it
Either way this is just more evidence that proves d8 isnt a synthetic
LOL…sure buddy, sure.
Artificial = synthetic to laypersons (and any thinking human). Remember, we are talking about non-experts here, so the fact they don’t use proper nomenclature isn’t a big surprise.
/mic drop…done…goodbye
Lol 
You obviously don’t know anything about diction and the human language
Artificial doesn’t mean synthetic or they’d regulate d8 as a “synthetic” I mean why would they need new regulations to cover a loophole if it was covered 
Youre logic is flawed
I’m sure we’ll know pretty soon when @iontrap tests your gummies and sends the alphabet boys a manifesto.
Coming from the king of poor syntax
If it’s a research standard it’s legal even if you’re selling it to people without testing labs.
I could care less what he does, my gummys are federally legal and I stand behind my product 100%
I mean, I agree that at this point it’s foolish not to pursue D8 as a potential revenue stream if you’re in the hemp space.
As of now there’s no precedent for the DEA or any type of feds to stop your operation and it’d be an uphill battle for them to prosecute you given the contradiction and struggle between the farm Bill and the DEA.
I do, however, believe that the feds are taking their time to build a case and that eventually they will bring the hammer down with a mighty force.
That’d would be a shitty time to be in the D8 business.
Make your money while you can but know when the bear market is coming, cause (IMO) it’s coming.
My question I ask everyone,
If .3% thc is suspended in a non water mixture, but tests under the .3%thc is that legal? Seems like a huge loop hole the government didn’t mean to make
Dilution finished products are safer bets than carts.
Garlic and parmesan mother liquor FTW
Absolutely which begs the question…
Did they mean to make that loophole
The laws were written by people unaware that cbd could turn into something that gets you high.
Absolutely. The intent of the law is different than the interpretation. That’s where most arguments fall apart. You may be able to not be charged with a good lawyer and lots of legal fees, but they’ll make precedent. Do any of us really want to be that guy?
I believe this is an important ongoing discussion and wish @Kingofthekush420 @anon87263109 could refrain from the ad-hominem attacks.
Let’s stick to the topic. Not people’s understanding (or lack thereof) of the English language
I agree. Martyrdom sucks
I think in summary;
A. The D8 from hemp market is largely unregulated
B. We all know from history, it’s only a matter of time until regulations are made and eventually enforced
C. Any activity in this market is risky and could carry serious civil or criminal consequences
D. And this is where it’s gets controversial; is participating in this market ethical
That’s not the path I’m willing to take.
Just replace MBS products with D8
Please show me what logical fallacy I posted. I’ll wait.
What I wrote is not ad-hominem. It’s discussing a news release about OR. Calling him “Mr. Wiki Screenshot Master” is a fact, that’s what he is. Or shall I post the hundreds of posts he made of Wiki?
There comes a time when one must call bullshit what it is.