Great for you.
Enjoy your liability.
Your insurer must love you.
In all seriousness, though, what flavor gummy we making today?
Great for you.
Enjoy your liability.
Your insurer must love you.
In all seriousness, though, what flavor gummy we making today?
You sound like you have problems getting insurance
Must have had accidents
We don’t have that problem
I have great insurance, we have like 7 policies for our government contracts we work on.
You keep alluding the question on everyones minds, what flavor trap gummy we making today?
Bring back @spdking
Pretty sure the ethanol industry stopped using organic solvents to break the azeotrope last century
what does 7 policies for government work have anything to do with cannabis? Weird wanna be flex. Stop changing the subject why do you resort to personal attacks so much? You really like to divert from the question. We can handle personal shit in person when there isn’t security around
Worldwide?
IDK about world-wide, but I got laughed at by someone for asking a supplier back in 2012 or so…
Why did you call him butterball?
Rowan was very nice in person and shares a lot of game on this site(so do you ) and looked quite fit.
What’s an economical way to reproof?
I’m not being argumentative I’m actually asking.
probably some of the best advice
You’re interpretation of solvents and classified areas are wrong. You have called certain solvents c1d1 multiple times. Those classes and divisions apply to areas and the solvent- associated dangers in those areas. You talk like CA cannabis regulators designate those areas based on the solvents used, but in actuality the code comes from the commonality of BHO systems and the likelihood of combustible solvents being introduced to the working atmosphere in normal working conditions.
But here you are, arguing again, about a subject of which you have marginal knowledge.
A Rectification column is going to be your best bet.
Most AHJs in cannabis don’t know NFPA fire code which is WHERE this actually comes from, which is why PSI will try and educate incorrect AHJs. Doesn’t always work, but some actually listen when they realize this stuff is in the NFPA fire codes.
Calling a solvent C1D1 and claiming to educate AHJs on code is quite the contradiction.
Where in this post did I even say c1d1?
Please show me
Excuse me, you claimed heptane is c1d2. Regardless, you called a solvent by an area classification.
Lol that was over a year ago
Why don’t you actually quote something from this post
Regardless if you’d like a tour of a type 6 using heptane I can show you 2 I helped get away from ethanol
Others have already quoted you saying more dumb stuff in this thread. I’m not going to waste my time. Every conversation is so fruitful with you though. Good catching up.
Lol I could say the same thing
Atleast my membrane business and lab didn’t implode