Look at the language those other labs use, “not an official COA”, “other labs may identify d9”, “we have reason to believe the d9 results may not be correct”
Kca has gc/ms confirmation, and no wishy washy exculpatory language. They say it’s there, and offer the proof
So to clarify I’m not saying DEA labs are right or that they’re a DEA lab means their better or more accurate.
ACS has trashed many a COA just for our lab alone.
I’m asking because as liability goes a COA from a DEA lab means more to these big companies looking for large contracts and makes all these lawyers feel comfortable to sign off on doing d8.
So I’m curious if many labs out there have been able to get a DEA lab to clear their d8. Whether it’s right or wrong, just that a DEA lab signed off on compliance.
That’s was the ONLY question ever being asked here.
Have people seen many labs getting DEA COAs that are complaint on their d8. For no other reason then I’m curious to see if there are many labs out there doing so.
DEA labs mean dip shit to the actual validity of the test
I understand where you’re coming from, just because the lab signs off though doesn’t mean you’re in the clear. For instance, if you sold some d8 to someone with a COA saying its compliant when it’s not and they got in trouble I guarantee the DEA would say you knew it wasn’t compliant because of your comments and stuff on this site. You’d still get screwed. Ignorance of the law is no excuse and playing dumb off a COA isn’t a smart move DEA lab or not.
Can you provide a link please I cannot find a reference to a list with d8 on it. And what is your thoughts on this
State Agriculture Commissioner Nikki Fried, who oversees Florida’s hemp program, says Delta-8-THC is likely here to stay.
“As long as they are following the rules regarding the Delta-9 and it collectively doesn’t get us over the threshold of the .3 then we are not taking it off the market,” said Fried.
Hes talking about this list which lists it under code 7370 which is THCs (which hemp doesn’t apply to)
Here you go.
https://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/schedules/orangebook/c_cs_alpha.pdf
I think she is gonna get a lotta people arrest and she is the shitty person responsible for our fucked up vertical marijuana program. She’s a paid politician
Beat me to it
Is hemp considered a cannabis sativa plant with a thc under .3%? So when your extracting “hemp” with 4% thc. That is no longer hemp. It’s low thc cannabis sativa. Or marijuana.
Also who bans Thebacon
https://future4200.com/t/dea-response-to-hia-re-botanical-lawsuit/114917/528?u=kingofthekush420
Yet when you make isolate you concentrate the thc above compliant level then remediate thc though crystallization
The same thing can happen with d8
There’s no reason you can’t make compliant d8 it’s already been done
then according to the DEA your breaking federal law!
I just wanna try Thebacon
Section 12619 of the 2018 Farm Bill amends the Controlled Substances Act in two ways: It removes hemp from the definition of marijuana in section 102(16) of the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. § 802(16). In listing THC as a Schedule I controlled substance in section 202(c) of the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. § 812(c), it creates an EXEMPT for tetrahydrocannabinols in hemp. Section 10113 of the 2018 Farm Bill defines hemp more broadly than the 2014 Farm Bill defined “industrial hemp” thus eliminating any question that both the plants and products derived from the plants are legal, so long as the THC concentration does not exceed 0.3 percent. In that regard, section 10113 provides that “the term ‘hemp’ means the plant Cannabis sativa L. and any part of that plant, including the seeds thereof and all derivatives, extracts, cannabinoids, isomers, acids, salts, and salts of isomers, whether growing or not, with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis.” Any cannabis plant or product that contains more than 0.3 percent THC will still be considered marijuana under federal law.
Oil ≠ plants
the dea already made it very clear on how they interpretate the farm bill. Im not worried about the USDA. Im worried about them alphabet boyz kicking in the door
This is the part ppl have problems with
ALL DERIVATIVES
i have absolutly no horse in this race unlike you.
we see your bias… me on the other hand are trying to save some people the lawyer money and possible jail time while your trying to make a buck… 
21 U.S.C. § 812(c), it creates an exception for tetrahydrocannabinols in hemp
Doesnt this destroy your argument?
You hate any cannabinoid that’s not d9
Youre more bias then me 
i just know that the real one… not the fake one… LOL
