Hey,
They’re doing their donation drive.
Lord knows I’ve used Wikipedia for nearly every solvent I’ve thought about using. Plus every industrial process.
Throw them $5, or $50, or $500. Lord knows that thing needs to be running just as bad as this site.
Thx!
Let wikipedia die, its trash. It is incredibly biased, and will only get worse due to inherent structural problems
I am way more interested in Larry Sellers newest idea
Is it up and running?
In the meantime wiki’s doing just fine for baseline knowledge, and I don’t think “bias” is an underlying issue for anything I’m looking up 
I find wikipedia a great resource especially for math and science. I don’t know what bias you think is infecting them. They have a rule you can only repeat secondary sources because it would turn into constant flame wars otherwise.
fair as far as most STEM things
yes if you stick to those subjects you avoid most of the bias