whats wild to me is your were a chemist that made these drugs back in the day no? did you not fully imerse yourself in them and all possible combinations of what you made?
Of course I have and I enjoyed them for what they are. And I actually did read and think quite a bit about psychedelics being a doorway into another dimension but it does not negate the world in which we live in now. It does not negate mathematics. It does not negate science. And we can say it does not negate any one specific religion
1 Like
ok you can have your own opion on the matter without attacking mine lol i get this is not a popular opion but what matters is my life and my life only has improoved by it and i will continue down this path until i have a reson not to
well we can disagree on that one and like i said its working for me and my life has chenged and improved drasticly because of it that much i do know
Bro as long as youâre happy Iâm happy for you but I will not back away from certain realities even if they do not match what you think should be. We can disagree and still be friends but it doesnât mean that I should stop defending reality
1 Like
Although as Iâve mentioned above localized reality does not really exist⌠If that can make any sense at all⌠but apparently it does and itâs been proven
1 Like
define localized reality
1 Like
im not a quantumn psychisist and not going to pretend i understand what they are saying. that doesnt make what im saying wrong tho
i do knoiw i was an atheist for long time and chemistry made me beliver of a exsistence of a good and psychedelics just confirmed thats its not the god in any religon and that like i said from the start is why i said neil is clowning terrnce in the first place and the fact he called out the vaccine
Okay letâs assume I agree with you and Neil deGrasse Tyson is the gatekeeper to the mystical land of⌠Errrr⌠I donât know what but either way he is the GateKeeper. How does it negate his criticism? How does it negate my criticism? How does it negate the criticism of the physicist Sabine?
well because being the gate keeper he cant call out the very thing he is gatekeeping ie the source of the true god and the issue with the vaccine so the attack hime for his beleifs.
as crazy as he sounds to me he isnt showing any signs of psychosis or bring unstable either no mateer how crazy he sounds and why did so many people get so triggered by what he said in the first place?
1 Like
You misunderstanding me. Iâm not critiquing his mental stability. I am critiquing and downright beclowning his scientific stance.
2 Likes
ok for sure but i dont think his stanve on science is why he got the backlash
Well it did from me. And as far as Neil deGrasse Tyson and Sabine goes⌠I do not know their motivation but I do understand and agree with their stance on the matter. One should not judge the messenger but the message they bring.
1 Like
fair enough but there could more then just that going on in what he said. the part about religion and the vaccine were the most important part of the interview imo
Iâm sorry but i did not hang long enough into the interview to hear him talk about that. I just couldnât take any more of the nonsense he was putting out about science and mathematics after a while.
thats exactly my point - majority of people missed the most important part of the video and the only parts that are gaing traction are the parts hes being ridicued bout all while keeping people away from the true message buried in the interview lol
scroll through abnd check it out
here ill help you out
thats exactly what the gatekeepers dont want you to fiqure out
1 Like
Fair enough but at the same time it reminds me an old story about an aspiring writer that sent Mark Twain a book he wrote for a review. A few weeks later Mark Twain sent him to book back with a bad review. The aspiring writer wrote back Mark Twain âhow can you give my book a bad review when I know you did not read it all. A little past halfway through the book I glued three pages together to see if you would separate them and actually read and I got the book back with the pages still gluedâ to which Mark Twain replied âif I am served a rotten egg for breakfast I do not need to eat the whole egg to know itâs rottenâ.
1 Like