New tissue analysis feature in HydroBuddy v1.99

@emdub27 figured you would be interested in this:

The blog post rhetorically asks: “How do I figure out the WUE?”

My answer: Plant sap flow meter

HDF type plant sap flow meter: Dynagage Sap Flow Sensor - Dynamax

I have been planning to buy a few plant sap flow meters for testing. I hope to track and graph plant transpiration based on climate, air flow velocity, PPFD, plant age, growth phase, dry backs, and nutrient profile. Flowers transpire much less than leaves, so I expect a reduced transpiration rate in mid-to-late flowering vs. veg phases. Although veg plants are smaller with less leaf surface, so the difference in transpiration may be reduced.

But with the new Hydrobuddy version, the plant sap flow meter data just got much more interesting.

1 Like

Interesting, I’ll play with it tomorrow. The approach reminds me of Torsten Ingestad and Demand Driven Fertilization. Most people’s heads are going to spin when they use the UNC numbers and see that the fertigation solution has more N than K.

1 Like

Here are the default cannabis leaf values and nutrient solution profiles included in v1.99. I am looking forward to reading what you think.

I agree wrt K and N. And those P values are way too low, like nearly P deficiency low.

I won’t be the first to run these profile, lol :nauseated_face: :rofl:

I have some doubts about the usefulness of this new feature, at least in its current form. This feature is based on Dr. Bugbee’s paper regarding reservoir refill solutions based on mass balance uptake, which seems primarily applicable to recirculating hydroponics.

All of them show K less than N, and this is from the blog:

The above implies that values should not be used without considering the context and that this context might be much more important for some nutrients, for example micro nutrients, than for other elements, for example K and Ca, for which the availability windows and plant uptake are much more straightforward. The plant characteristics should also be taken into account. While a leaf tissue derived approach might only require 50 ppm of Ca in a lettuce crop, we know we need to feed more due to the poor water transport of this plant into new leaves.

Second, the approach assumes that all we care about is leaf composition. This is a perfectly fine if we are growing leafy greens, but if you’re growing a tomato plant, the composition will be heavily split between leaves and fruits as soon as flower pollination ends. For this reason, the nutritional needs of other important tissues – such as sink organs – should be considered very carefully when following this approach. In the case of tomatoes, this might mean feeding substantially higher levels of K, as this element has a much higher concentration in fruits than it has in leaves.