and let me clarify, this was a coa presented to me in the hopes of selling as smokable hemp flower, which, well either way i dont think is a realistic goal after seeing the coa
lol i know someone here knows this. please shed some light this is one of those extremely crucial moments in life and i cant fuck it up. i suppose I’ll just call the lab tomorrow and ask directly but didnt want to bother them, as I’m sure they’re busy.
yes but if the flower were dried to the correct moisture content for smoking, the thc level would rise when tested. Moisture content is directly inverse to cannabinoid %, as all these tests are done against weight.
if it lost 70% weight when dried, you can say roughly that the percentages will go up that amount as well… or that’s how I’ve come to understand it
A sample is dried prior to cannabinoid analysis or the results would be inconsistent. This is done with or without heat. Different methods require different preparations.
If they put that it lost 70% of its weight in moisture it is most likely that the results are measured after drying and not before.
Judging by your results it appears they used heat to dry the sample because its pretty heavily decarbed. That ratio of cannabinoids doesnt naturally occurr in the plant and it requires heat and/or time to get it.
The total cannabinoid content looks right but theres almost no THCa and mostly CBD which is decarbed CBDa
Generally speaking with high CBD hemp strains the CBD and THC levels correlate with each other. A good hemp strain will have a 30:1 cbd:thc or even higher.
You want to take it until the THC level is just under .3% because that means youre getting the highest amount of CBD that plant can produce based on its ratio
I see, that makes sense and was the basis of my confusion. Ive heard of the tricks to finesse lab tests so I had assumed that it was tested at what it was sent as.